Re: [Asrg] Adding a spam button to MUAs

der Mouse <mouse@Rodents-Montreal.ORG> Thu, 10 December 2009 02:49 UTC

Return-Path: <mouse@Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D5063A6A4E for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Dec 2009 18:49:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.232
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.232 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION=0.156]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bwC8p7c-GI1K for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Dec 2009 18:49:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG (Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG [216.46.5.7]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 137883A6A05 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 9 Dec 2009 18:49:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from mouse@localhost) by Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA09081; Wed, 9 Dec 2009 21:49:29 -0500 (EST)
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents-Montreal.ORG>
Message-Id: <200912100249.VAA09081@Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Erik-Conspiracy: There is no Conspiracy - and if there were I wouldn't be part of it anyway.
X-Message-Flag: Microsoft: the company who gave us the botnet zombies.
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 21:47:12 -0500 (EST)
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
In-Reply-To: <20091210023913.F322224218@panix5.panix.com>
References: <20091209202807.81190.qmail@simone.iecc.com> <20091209235730.7958324216@panix5.panix.com> <A1AF1DFB-40D4-4E7D-AA3C-3F865CBF14C6@blighty.com> <20091210023913.F322224218@panix5.panix.com>
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Adding a spam button to MUAs
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 02:49:43 -0000

>> That's beside the point, though.  What is the disadvantage of
>> sending reports to spammers?
> 1. It confirms the address.

Is there any reason to think spammers still care about this?

I can't see any reason for them to, I can see reason for them not to,
and I haven't seen anything but very old data being repeated to support
the implicit claim that they still do.

Also, my own SMTP sink gives me some small reason to think they don't
bother, for what it's worth.

/~\ The ASCII				  Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML		mouse@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email!	     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B