Re: [Asrg] request for review for a non FUSSP proposal

Claudio Telmon <claudio@telmon.org> Tue, 23 June 2009 11:59 UTC

Return-Path: <claudio@telmon.org>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 915EC28C2D5 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.582
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.582 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.137, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KOdfBrK8Pam0 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:59:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slim-2a.inet.it (slim-2a.inet.it [213.92.5.122]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A695428C2D2 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 88-149-250-16.dynamic.ngi.it ([::ffff:88.149.250.16]) by slim-2a.inet.it via I-SMTP-5.6.0-560 id ::ffff:88.149.250.16+PXmmAYmURBh; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:59:49 +0200
Message-ID: <4A40C3B4.5060103@telmon.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:59:48 +0200
From: Claudio Telmon <claudio@telmon.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090318 Lightning/0.8 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
References: <4A3DFC91.2090506@telmon.org> <4A3F9B2B.8020603@tana.it> <4A3FF3AF.9030401@telmon.org> <4A3FF7F1.1060705@nd.edu> <4A3FFB64.6030409@telmon.org> <20090622215251.GA2137@gsp.org> <4A400246.9060103@telmon.org> <1245709864.77647.26.camel@legolas.orthanc.ca> <E4491C663C5CE5D2397CAEDB@lewes.staff.uscs.susx.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <E4491C663C5CE5D2397CAEDB@lewes.staff.uscs.susx.ac.uk>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Asrg] request for review for a non FUSSP proposal
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:59:35 -0000

Ian Eiloart wrote:

> However, the burden placed
> on end users should not be a cognitive burden - most won't cope.

If I understand what you mean, then IMHO this framework should pass this
cognitive test, since the availability of tokens to correspondents (and
spammers) should be easy to understand... well, much easier than
failures of digital signatures, DSN, and locks on web pages, anyway...

-- 

Claudio Telmon
claudio@telmon.org
http://www.telmon.org