IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Asrg] request for review for a non FUSSP proposal

Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca> Mon, 22 June 2009 22:30 UTC

Return-Path: <lyndon@orthanc.ca>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5897128C276 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P+pLBTQqcLCH for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from orthanc.ca (orthanc.ca [208.86.224.138]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C5E528C10B for <asrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.42] (S01060011242eafe2.cg.shawcable.net [68.145.131.177]) (authenticated bits=0) by orthanc.ca (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n5MMVAsc093933 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:31:10 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from lyndon@orthanc.ca)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orthanc.ca; s=2009-1; t=1245709871; bh=O2Y2uJK7w61q67MA/O1IArsVJSCUtvqvVqtWFbfwDXY=; h=Subject:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=CNM9fddPqlg1mxk5MPe6iyKCPJRSWu/fqMYcPkV2i2PRw82341PSnAcf7qT1IZoPc pJQRAz07TMdg89NiVpuTxyMaMrFkoWzMeGvyU7blXWT/kTohJkpa0kt5mE/W/V8UUJ 9IphPH24SYQlSL/dfe/MYzTRSolirdvwlN2npjKhf6iwKreEtMGKzkacivRhqWNG4A rUoeuMdum13RlsTSwAgtxPy4vHW74aUDlIjwf5tMZVM5pKDUUwLxT6VoO3IVnD1oMe PAvS/0i/qq0BS5p0+TFDduqA0ZBAJv6cQwjGxZPTCCWjV/KYLJYKW0OZMkWijSJlA6 LPG1qoPgl2DDA==
From: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca>
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
In-Reply-To: <4A400246.9060103@telmon.org>
References: <4A3DFC91.2090506@telmon.org> <4A3F9B2B.8020603@tana.it> <4A3FF3AF.9030401@telmon.org> <4A3FF7F1.1060705@nd.edu> <4A3FFB64.6030409@telmon.org> <20090622215251.GA2137@gsp.org> <4A400246.9060103@telmon.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:31:04 -0600
Message-Id: <1245709864.77647.26.camel@legolas.orthanc.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Asrg] request for review for a non FUSSP proposal
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:30:58 -0000

On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 00:14 +0200, Claudio Telmon wrote:
> These, in turn, can see that spam
> arrives with the tokens they provided to the system owner, inform the
> system owner about this fact and invalidate the tokens. Once the
> system
> security is "restored", the spammer is left with useless tokens.
> Collected consent-protected addresses are useless without valid
> tokens.

All of which puts the burden once again -- or 'still' -- on the backs of
the innocent victims. This doesn't solve anything.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email