IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Asrg] DNSBL and IPv6

Matthias Leisi <matthias@leisi.net> Sat, 20 October 2012 06:55 UTC

Return-Path: <matthias@leisi.net>
X-Original-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F0E21F8722 for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 23:55:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.677
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.677 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IW4gIBFc7URk for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 23:55:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A84E21F861D for <asrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 23:55:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f182.google.com with SMTP id wc20so1461634obb.13 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 23:55:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=OkGBrIkcsuF95nJrNXHgtQeBE5MlA1bph3zb9boU9Rc=; b=GPMu4yKfoXOW1pc6qZ7VHCZ+cOMEl0W9pv6gJnNgcPrv6rAjtxEMzkHn2xd0MlWtjw XZ9QQYQMsTbc2qldVoh7mR/P2kXSjUtul2JHOJnmwV04Sj1SxFVpX9u0xuQulT9TY7s7 2cKPiQsvZ0k87MEbt4osemCu9OhWOM5rMil5VbApu7VgMtNA7KyN4KBdV8RS5IQQEyr8 ZRKZDSyElK1lS5N2BuvE/a5qb3+gfjco4EkM1jkHceED0FVzvER8KHOxtGI0TKUbVvIe DXtmeGGeldSyXUpY2ahaxJF8i5/mLhltK8jBoVYG6uAb2LKdYFBTSH7QzA++tYzJyrQ7 7ZUQ==
Received: by 10.60.27.71 with SMTP id r7mr3397907oeg.96.1350716158006; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 23:55:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.76.3.173 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 23:55:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1210200638000.28593@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <20121019224131.28382.qmail@joyce.lan> <5081EF6F.9030808@hireahit.com> <5C0A004C-1BAD-4103-85C2-B94B718F0367@blighty.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1210200638000.28593@uplift.swm.pp.se>
From: Matthias Leisi <matthias@leisi.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 08:55:37 +0200
Message-ID: <CALgnk9o941B6zXQwGc7W1QL58zB-_cpTjymk2A2MFdTdL2vnJw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkyELUGwKOlwoXwoGFdM2cN/rjd9jxgZVbSufgzIpKA03EdcN2PpcwyInRVdRVtlvo681Kd
Subject: Re: [Asrg] DNSBL and IPv6
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 06:55:59 -0000

On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:

> I agree. Although I believe some ISPs will put multiple customers in a
> single /64, this is mostly going to be dynamic customers anyway (multiple
> laptops on a wifi for instance), and those I would imagine are treated with
> the same policy so it doesn't really matter. Per /64 handling is a
> reasonable tradeoff between granularity and practicality in my mind.

And cheap VPS, where the "upgrade" from /128 to /64 is used as a
differentiator (just stumbled upon such a case,
http://www.kimsufi.com/fr/vks/).

-- Matthias

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email