IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Asrg] Spam Ecomomics

Gadi Evron <ge@linuxbox.org> Fri, 31 December 2004 16:39 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA09935 for <asrg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Dec 2004 11:39:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CkPzq-0004Lg-5m for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 31 Dec 2004 11:51:27 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CkPh6-0000zf-PU; Fri, 31 Dec 2004 11:32:04 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CkPX0-00077z-DM for asrg@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 31 Dec 2004 11:21:38 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA08398 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Dec 2004 11:21:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from linuxbox.org ([24.155.83.21] ident=root) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CkPiZ-0003lO-Iq for asrg@ietf.org; Fri, 31 Dec 2004 11:33:35 -0500
Received: from [192.115.22.106] (prometheus.solaris.org.il [192.115.22.106]) (authenticated bits=0) by linuxbox.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-3) with ESMTP id iBVGOkZV021192 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 31 Dec 2004 10:24:48 -0600
Message-ID: <41D57E7F.606@linuxbox.org>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 18:29:51 +0200
From: Gadi Evron <ge@linuxbox.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Hannigan, Martin" <hannigan@verisign.com>
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Spam Ecomomics
References: <A206819EF47CBE4F84B5CB4A303CEB7A14A476@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
In-Reply-To: <A206819EF47CBE4F84B5CB4A303CEB7A14A476@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on linuxbox.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7a6398bf8aaeabc7a7bb696b6b0a2aad
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "'asrg@ietf.org'" <asrg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: asrg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 856eb5f76e7a34990d1d457d8e8e5b7f
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hannigan, Martin wrote:
> Sorry - Gadi, possible, but you're doing a good job explaining. I'm only on
> my second cup of 4 coffees this morning. 
> 
> If a trojan is shipped in a spam, its still classically defined spam.

Nahh, martin, it is probably my cold effecting my mind. :)

What I meant by that is, that ther traffic that worms generate on SMTP 
along with spam, would consist of most of the SMTP traffic about. Would 
you disagree?

	Gadi.

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email