IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Asrg] Spam Ecomomics

"Hannigan, Martin" <hannigan@verisign.com> Fri, 31 December 2004 16:14 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA07954 for <asrg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Dec 2004 11:14:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CkPbZ-0003aA-2v for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 31 Dec 2004 11:26:22 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CkPLE-0003Hg-Qu; Fri, 31 Dec 2004 11:09:28 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CkPCS-0000IN-0B for asrg@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 31 Dec 2004 11:00:24 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA06276 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Dec 2004 11:00:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: from falcon.verisign.com ([216.168.239.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CkPO0-0002wv-V0 for asrg@ietf.org; Fri, 31 Dec 2004 11:12:21 -0500
Received: from VSVAPOSTALGW1.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (vsvapostalgw1.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com [10.170.12.38]) by falcon.verisign.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iBVFtUop001097; Fri, 31 Dec 2004 10:55:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: by vsvapostalgw1.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id <Y05Q5RL5>; Fri, 31 Dec 2004 10:59:52 -0500
Message-ID: <A206819EF47CBE4F84B5CB4A303CEB7A14A475@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
From: "Hannigan, Martin" <hannigan@verisign.com>
To: "'ge@linuxbox.org'" <ge@linuxbox.org>
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Spam Ecomomics
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 10:59:47 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ea4ac80f790299f943f0a53be7e1a21a
Cc: "'asrg@ietf.org'" <asrg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: asrg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: bb8f917bb6b8da28fc948aeffb74aa17

If they are moving over port 25, its smtp traffic by design. Is is safe to
classify this traffic as "spam" by its nature? 


-M



---
Martin Hannigan
hannigan@verisign.com
Verisign, Inc.


-----Original Message-----
From: Gadi Evron <ge@linuxbox.org>
To: Hannigan, Martin <hannigan@verisign.com>
CC: asrg@johnlevine.com <asrg@johnlevine.com>; asrg@ietf.org <asrg@ietf.org>
Sent: Fri Dec 31 07:59:48 2004
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Spam Ecomomics

Hannigan, Martin wrote:
> 
> So what are we saying? Systemic destruction of spam is not necessary? 

No. It simply says that spam is not the biggest bandwidth bogger - by 
itself. With viruses and spyware I'd put money on it.

	Gadi.

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email