Re: [Asrg] Re: Spam, why is it still a problem?

Gadi Evron <ge@linuxbox.org> Tue, 17 January 2006 10:19 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Eynvy-0003hS-2u; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 05:19:26 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Eynvx-0003fM-3N for asrg@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 05:19:25 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA02468 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 05:18:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from linuxbox.org ([24.155.83.21] ident=root) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eyo41-00080k-P6 for asrg@ietf.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 05:27:48 -0500
Received: from [192.115.22.106] (prometheus.solaris.org.il [192.115.22.106]) (authenticated bits=0) by linuxbox.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k0HAGTcY020885; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 04:17:00 -0600
Message-ID: <43CCC3B6.40706@linuxbox.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 12:15:18 +0200
From: Gadi Evron <ge@linuxbox.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Re: Spam, why is it still a problem?
References: <9qBEYaDyZ2yDFwj7@siliconglen.com> <20060117095618.GB16889@nic.fr>
In-Reply-To: <20060117095618.GB16889@nic.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.7.5 (linuxbox.org [24.155.83.21]); Tue, 17 Jan 2006 04:17:32 -0600 (CST)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.3
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on linuxbox.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 97adf591118a232206bdb5a27b217034
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: asrg@ietf.org, Craig Cockburn <craig@siliconglen.com>
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: asrg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-bounces@ietf.org

Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> Stop expecting. Learn to live with social problems like we live with a
> lot of other social problems. Only in engineering people ask for
> perfect solutions. The real world does not work that way.

That is the single issue I can't agree with you on.

Living with social problems is critical, we need to keep living.

Accepting them?

Why should I accept murder, rape? Or perhaps even just smallish-time stuff?

We should always strive for betterment, and I believe the guy asking the 
question meant it in a non FUSSP fashion, i.e.:
How do we explain to the END USER why there is still spam?

I am not sure I am the most qualified here, but I'd attempt something like:
1. Engineering solutions to problems are not always perfect, but they 
help bring them to manageable levels (if you employ them). Are you 
employing anti spam solutions?

-- How can a user distinguish good from bad? In the anti spyware 
industry a user may just end up infected.

2. Spam is *ALSO* a social problem, and therefore needs to be dealt with 
at a social level as well. Are you writing your congressman to ask for 
new and improved anti spam legislation? Have you been in anti spam 
demonstrations? :)

Hmm, I am not sure what would be other, or BETTER suggestions for an 
answer, but maybe we should come up with these? Unless somebody already did?

	Gadi.

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg