IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Asrg] DNS over SCTP

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Thu, 28 May 2009 14:20 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D929F3A69BA for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 May 2009 07:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.443
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.443 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.276, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GIiCOqTDMa1f for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 May 2009 07:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (mail.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 919463A68F5 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 28 May 2009 07:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.25.197.158] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.158]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 ale@tana.it, TLS: TLS1.0, 256bits, RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1) by wmail.tana.it with esmtp; Thu, 28 May 2009 16:16:11 +0200 id 00000000005DC03B.000000004A1E9CAB.00002AA5
Message-ID: <4A1E9CBF.4010703@tana.it>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 16:16:31 +0200
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
References: <003d01c9dd01$bf3531d0$800c6f0a@china.huawei.com> <4A1A45BA.5030704@swin.edu.au> <3be421270905250718y5d62f6d5odb6f2bebecf418d0@mail.gmail.com> <6684E747-55CB-4BB3-B838-9F4FE906AFE7@mail-abuse.org> <200905251603.MAA16221@Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG> <CCE0A3E1-4BCB-460C-AEA0-6548BB4AE8FE@mail-abuse.org> <4A1D64C9.5060505@tana.it> <47BC2197-472E-4615-97D2-F7E42B8F3B7D@mail-abuse.org> <4A1E8BD3.8000103@tana.it> <20090528131509.GA13521@nic.fr>
In-Reply-To: <20090528131509.GA13521@nic.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Asrg] DNS over SCTP
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 14:20:11 -0000

Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>> It seems that DNS over SCTP would solve 90% of the problems with 10%
>> of the efforts and resources required to implement DNSSEC. However,
>> I hear more often about the latter than the former. How come?
> 
> I've read this message via the IETF general mailing list and so I
> missed the beginning. In what way can you compare DNSSEC (which
> provides object security) and SCTP or TCP (which provide a better
> channel security for DNS)?

The discussion was about how to get rid of the threats illustrated, 
e.g., in Kaminsky, D.: "It’s the end of the cache as we know it." In: 
Black Hat conference (2008). Online at 
http://www.doxpara.com/DMK_BO2K8.ppt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email