Re: [Asrg] who gets the report, was We really don't need

Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> Mon, 08 February 2010 17:43 UTC

Return-Path: <schaefer@closedmail.com>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF6028C0DE for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 09:43:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.379
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.379 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.095, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_MILLIONSOF=0.315]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VquYxKpfF18u for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 09:43:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vms173019pub.verizon.net (vms173019pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.19]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B86F228C140 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 09:43:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from torch.brasslantern.com ([unknown] [173.67.92.79]) by vms173019.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0KXJ0092XALOB1D4@vms173019.mailsrvcs.net> for asrg@irtf.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:44:13 -0600 (CST)
Received: from torch.brasslantern.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by torch.brasslantern.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o18HiCat010770 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 09:44:12 -0800
Received: (from schaefer@localhost) by torch.brasslantern.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id o18HiBUq010769 for asrg@irtf.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 09:44:12 -0800
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Message-id: <100208094411.ZM10768@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 09:44:11 -0800
In-reply-to: <20100208153359.56374.qmail@simone.iecc.com>
Comments: In reply to John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> "Re: [Asrg] who gets the report, was We really don't need" (Feb 8, 3:33pm)
References: <20100208153359.56374.qmail@simone.iecc.com>
X-Mailer: OpenZMail Classic (0.9.2 24April2005)
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: [Asrg] who gets the report, was We really don't need
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:43:16 -0000

On Feb 8,  3:33pm, John Levine wrote:
}
} If a spammer wants to confirm receipt, which very few of them do,
} he uses web bugs.  I suppose info about the MUA might be marginally
} useful, but if I were a spammer and knew that a recipient was
} sufficiently annoyed to press the spam button, I'd take them off the
} list.  I still have millions of other people to mail to, after all.

And what if you were not a spammer, but a phisher?