Re: [Asrg] Implicit Consent (was: Another criteria for "what is spam"...)
"Richard Johnson" <rdump@river.com> Thu, 05 June 2003 19:29 UTC
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA13408 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 15:29:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h55JSlp01889 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 15:28:47 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h55JSlB01886 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 15:28:47 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA13399; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 15:28:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19O0Nx-0002Zh-00; Thu, 05 Jun 2003 15:26:53 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=www1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19O0Nx-0002Ze-00; Thu, 05 Jun 2003 15:26:53 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h55JL8B01457; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 15:21:08 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h55JK1B01380 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 15:20:01 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA13037 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 15:19:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19O0FT-0002V0-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2003 15:18:07 -0400
Received: from yampa.river.com ([206.168.112.68] helo=mdev.river.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19O0FT-0002Uv-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2003 15:18:07 -0400
Received: from localhost. (v13.river.com [206.168.117.188]) by mdev.river.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FFEE692D for <asrg@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 13:19:46 -0600 (MDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p05210601bb054721c889@localhost.>
In-Reply-To: <p06001210bb05024c0d16@[192.168.254.12]>
References: <p06001210bb05024c0d16@[192.168.254.12]>
To: asrg@ietf.org
From: Richard Johnson <rdump@river.com>
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Implicit Consent (was: Another criteria for "what is spam"...)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 13:19:36 -0600
At 10:21 -0400 on 2003-06-05, Bill Cole wrote: > > In your example, Mr. Kay's axiom would imply that X has implicitly > given permission for Y to mail him. > > I think that's sound. It's sound only when given a sunset provision. If I request a quote from a vendor, they should respond with a quote. However, they may -not- add me to their newsletter (or any other continuing stream of marketing jive) just because I requested a quote. [1] The implicit permission has to be limited by the context of the initial exchange, or we end up with just another excuse for Y spamming X. Richard [1] Example: I requested a PKI CA quote from Verisign, via telephone, and gave my email address to an engineer only after instructing him to keep it out of the hands of marketing. They slammed me into their newsletter anyway (repeatedly -- one of the RISKs of grepping /var/log/maillog is that you pick up those complaining and re-add them). They lost the $50k+renewal as a result. _______________________________________________ Asrg mailing list Asrg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
- Re: [Asrg] Implicit Consent (was: Another criteri… Bill Cole
- Re: [Asrg] Implicit Consent (was: Another criteri… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Implicit Consent (was: Another criteri… Dave Aronson
- RE: [Asrg] Implicit Consent (was: Another criteri… Peter Kay
- RE: [Asrg] Implicit Consent (was: Another criteri… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Implicit Consent (was: Another criteri… Richard Johnson
- RE: [Asrg] Implicit Consent (was: Another criteri… Richard Johnson
- Re: [Asrg] Implicit Consent (was: Another criteri… Troy Rollo
- RE: [Asrg] Implicit Consent (was: Another criteri… Troy Rollo
- RE: [Asrg] Implicit Consent (was: Another criteri… Eric D. Williams