Re: [Asrg] Summary of junk button discussion

der Mouse <mouse@Rodents-Montreal.ORG> Wed, 24 February 2010 15:37 UTC

Return-Path: <mouse@Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18DCB28C1AF for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 07:37:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.819
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.819 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.476, BAYES_05=-1.11, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION=0.156]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3kcJJ7MRcrO0 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 07:37:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG (Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG [216.46.5.7]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 052F228C1B9 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 07:37:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from mouse@localhost) by Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA21154; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:39:41 -0500 (EST)
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents-Montreal.ORG>
Message-Id: <201002241539.KAA21154@Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Erik-Conspiracy: There is no Conspiracy - and if there were I wouldn't be part of it anyway.
X-Message-Flag: Microsoft: the company who gave us the botnet zombies.
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:25:32 -0500 (EST)
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100223224938.GE2707@verdi>
References: <20100214005320.52916.qmail@simone.iecc.com> <BB012BD379D7B046ABE1472D8093C61C01C43AFDC9@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <20100223224938.GE2707@verdi>
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Summary of junk button discussion
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:37:53 -0000

> Frankly, anything but in the email itself will be abused.  abuse@ is
> already useless.

One of my jobs is at an ISP.  We maintain an abuse@, and I'm one of the
people who gets mail from it.

The ham/spam ratio I see in that mail stream is substantially higher
than it is for the other mail I get through them (and there are a
handful of other role addresses at that same ISP that forward to
me-among-others, so I do have something to compare with).  Indeed, the
abuse@ mail stream is practically nothing but real abuse reports -
presumably of real abuse, though I don't really know because
investigating them is not one of my jobs there.

Of course, others' experience may - probably will - differ.  But
"abuse@ is useless" disagrees with my experience.

/~\ The ASCII				  Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML		mouse@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email!	     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B