Re: [Asrg] misconception in SPF

Franck Martin <franck@avonsys.com> Mon, 10 December 2012 04:34 UTC

Return-Path: <franck@peachymango.org>
X-Original-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7C3A21F8DF1 for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 20:34:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_16=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pdeqGZzjKX2x for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 20:34:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.01.com (smtp.01.com [199.36.142.181]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3592C21F8DC7 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 20:34:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-out-2.01.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79A763900C8 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 22:34:35 -0600 (CST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp-out-2.01.com
Received: from smtp.01.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp-out-2.01.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xu6Ctzoc1+FH for <asrg@irtf.org>; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 22:34:35 -0600 (CST)
Received: from smtp.01.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-out-2.01.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51DB539013F for <asrg@irtf.org>; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 22:34:35 -0600 (CST)
Received: from mail-2.01.com (mail.01.com [172.18.30.178]) by smtp-out-2.01.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C8A63900C8 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 22:34:35 -0600 (CST)
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 22:34:35 -0600
From: Franck Martin <franck@avonsys.com>
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
Message-ID: <1915198247.6651.1355114075018.JavaMail.root@peachymango.org>
In-Reply-To: <20121210001652.21070.qmail@joyce.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [69.28.149.29]
X-Mailer: Zimbra 7.2.1_GA_2790 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Mac)/7.2.1_GA_2790)
Subject: Re: [Asrg] misconception in SPF
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 04:34:38 -0000

This issue is handled by DMARC, as it can work on all subdomains with only one TXT record.

If you try to do the same with SPF only, this may be complicated.

But then DMARC p=reject is not for all.