[Asrg] MUA as MSA or MTA (was Re: What are the IPs that sends mail for a domain?)
"J.D. Falk" <jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org> Mon, 22 June 2009 17:08 UTC
Return-Path: <jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36DBD3A6DE2 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:08:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8GMCKYPL2Z4D for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:08:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ocelope.disgruntled.net (ocelope.disgruntled.net [97.107.131.76]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0646828C18B for <asrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:08:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rpco-jdmacbook.rpcorp.local (np34.co.returnpath.net [38.109.196.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by ocelope.disgruntled.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n5MH977P003835 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <asrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:09:09 -0600
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.6.0 ocelope.disgruntled.net n5MH977P003835
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=cybernothing.org; s=satori; t=1245690549; bh=NHZ3S023PFBUxSw2+ax1W4H8giRPOjrYzb7vzNdR yso=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=gDXJgjoDK+j6AC51kzHeAgGIhhjagBa8mnJC4 cslDZ6E2iHcOJPgvj0+sAYlVH9nMXgDrAN4O3+ozaLA75jUESaWClJGEO8/WH3jtZjq xArS0NQCgnkdR785mY50iRZhR2xp1E8/ouFPda68jaRm6TJ994WoNZyjfrHc9mo9W+g =
Message-ID: <4A3FBAAE.4080100@cybernothing.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:09:02 -0600
From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 1.0b12 (Macintosh/2009051120)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Asrg] MUA as MSA or MTA (was Re: What are the IPs that sends mail for a domain?)
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:08:57 -0000
Alessandro Vesely wrote: > Being suspicious about their ESPs, those users may prefer to > deliver directly whenever possible. That is the only reason I see for > attempting a direct delivery first, and it is a largely suboptimal > solution anyway (e.g. it provides no reliable storage for sent messages.) What you're describing, here, is a vanishingly tiny minority of users. -- J.D. Falk
- [Asrg] MUA as MSA or MTA (was Re: What are the IP… J.D. Falk
- Re: [Asrg] MUA as MSA or MTA Alessandro Vesely