Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as a punishment

SM <sm@resistor.net> Wed, 25 January 2012 23:20 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9092E11E80E0 for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:20:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.621
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.621 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.022, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lflo3RK579ey for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:20:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF16611E80DF for <asrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:20:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0PNKj7j026356 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:20:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1327533650; i=@resistor.net; bh=z1bt6k5SMl9j7q6q+sh5ANtnxvz1O65G9mx45PNjz0k=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=JdN7DIGqwJBLvWwLT+/2KEsUJzIEX6ApDywXn3iBfm6RRqr6wlvzbKjwFf0RTFhao 8pzCCBJwkMOayExJEGnDy7sM5KcX/wKHUE3SSZNt28S31g7uvecUuyEP2ceStv7d+1 pMQ+mYbIJr0rVk97Yaj79n+F9rSndM+oMu7tecg4=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1327533650; i=@resistor.net; bh=z1bt6k5SMl9j7q6q+sh5ANtnxvz1O65G9mx45PNjz0k=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=LM2lcbYEjNJsbzTIeWijSuhS2QSDZhIhvas+E3jaOiGkzBRCfmQxbNZ1D9GRxsupR earxRPKckI5ZS0yVEYmuWDLNwlphJA33SUJcVh1vfSYHUS0FCTWHPsoW9Jqa0tgQ+3 sHSO6ZIY01aiipjfkU67l85IZJAIReaHlMYhFBsI=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120125145006.0b057ce8@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:57:47 -0800
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <4F207029.3030501@mail-abuse.org>
References: <18B53BA2A483AD45962AAD1397BE13253846E0FE87@UK-EXCHMBX1.green.sophos> <6.2.5.6.2.20120125102806.0ae6afe8@resistor.net> <4F2056AC.9060401@hireahit.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20120125114411.0c099da8@resistor.net> <4F207029.3030501@mail-abuse.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as a punishment
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:20:52 -0000

Hi Doug,
At 13:12 25-01-2012, Douglas Otis wrote:
>Many providers offer non-authoritative DNS servers.  SOPA and PIPA 
>bills attempt to regulate which domains are to be excluded, and 
>ignore authoritative DNS traffic not

I do not have any opinion about SOPA and PIPA bills.

BTW, do you have an opinion about Pippa? :-)

>Use of these caching services generate valuable information and 
>reduce network traffic between peers.

Could you elaborate on the "generate valuable information"?

Are there any examples of DNS "caching services" set up to reduce 
network traffic and why it is being done?

Regards,
-sm