Re: [Asrg] SMTP pull anyone?

mathew <meta@pobox.com> Sun, 16 August 2009 18:38 UTC

Return-Path: <meta404@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 102A83A6C7A for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 11:38:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s3xfjiJ1GbP0 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 11:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bw0-f222.google.com (mail-bw0-f222.google.com [209.85.218.222]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 074D23A6A49 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 11:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bwz22 with SMTP id 22so1947874bwz.18 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 11:38:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4qX1hwPY/YTbqen71VDJ4iz0IUhkTpWg2z94CE4dgtY=; b=sA5jtCSwrhD82n2yQLuc144X8BtJQrHdKafsz51NnbPFZDbT632pl6EO00lbcTiLEv 0Fhn0ZVfAr0nOdiGELXCxGeyLvRZaVhpEpeyzIyiJ8OR1UoWPSVGnqAY3/iLCmUk8f8j B60ttHagAxA6M6b3HyEtpNeCeeubT5+sOz84c=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=BzOOYw2tukGvPVdaeY6xxaBeIGW4YI5O3DF0VsgqZ6/782NHUGN5/G1NpzO0l9mQ5V xI5+n75mPJ5DqHopLfY/+PZ9jgDJLZCqYIaIZcJEOVSQPVartoO0ozAX0AlAm9aD7TVA /pP8Ly8Cx4FGCaI69mr+LvUqZsDhgrb34ORJ4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: meta404@gmail.com
Received: by 10.223.1.137 with SMTP id 9mr757439faf.93.1250447892901; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 11:38:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <922a897b0908160420w4554837aj684e86eb586823af@mail.gmail.com>
References: <922a897b0908160420w4554837aj684e86eb586823af@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 13:38:12 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: ff3e14fe217e5aa9
Message-ID: <7eeceb440908161138y6dc9563fgf464f4b8f09bf09e@mail.gmail.com>
From: mathew <meta@pobox.com>
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Asrg] SMTP pull anyone?
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 18:38:10 -0000

On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 06:20, Ravi shankar<ravisha22@gmail.com> wrote:
> Me and my buddy had a interesting discussion, which i thought could
> put across the geeks here.
[... pull e-mail description...]

I wrote up something very similar, and as noted, there was IM2000.

At this point, the consensus on this list as far as I can determine is
"Nothing will work, and if you think otherwise go implement it and
prove us wrong". So I'd suggest digging out an ANSI C compiler as your
only productive next step.


mathew
-- 
<URL:http://www.pobox.com/~meta/>