[Asrg] spam down?

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Sat, 26 January 2013 13:39 UTC

Return-Path: <mike@mtcc.com>
X-Original-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F330121F8769 for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 05:39:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3iBNZJiDrK5g for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 05:39:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mtcc.com (mtcc.com [IPv6:2001:5a8:4:9fe0:224:8cff:feaa:6d9b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01CD621F8522 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 05:38:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from takifugu.mtcc.com (takifugu.mtcc.com [50.0.18.224]) (authenticated bits=0) by mtcc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r0QDcMDo009586 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <asrg@irtf.org>; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 05:38:23 -0800
Message-ID: <5103DC4E.4090004@mtcc.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 05:38:22 -0800
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/20090605 Thunderbird/2.0.0.22 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=421; t=1359207503; x=1360071503; c=relaxed/simple; s=thundersaddle.kirkwood; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=mtcc.com; i=mike@mtcc.com; z=From:=20Michael=20Thomas=20<mike@mtcc.com> |Subject:=20spam=20down? |Sender:=20 |To:=20Anti-Spam=20Research=20Group=20-=20IRTF=20<asrg@irtf .org> |Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B=20charset=3DISO-8859-1=3B=20 format=3Dflowed |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=207bit |MIME-Version:=201.0; bh=oAkiauLR4gFmXlbqgv6ePk5zby5tVeX2944lcHrJH0w=; b=W8ZLr1qU+eOZUPjwiMhHLpJSlIG4k672MJfwg9baD+tWfAF1tez1lwTDh0 OPvA1u1ddUNdNF7bpMOpWst3xlkAMrZeQPe/mVgWWu8hof0J117OixLZLnT1 O2gnNnI2Y38w9KV6k7Cm2ToIuO/n74g50qbdGEVjAyVsJQV4IBeuA=;
Authentication-Results: mtcc.com; v=0.1; dkim=pass header.i=mike@mtcc.com ( sig from mtcc.com/thundersaddle.kirkwood verified; ); dkim-asp=pass header.From=mike@mtcc.com
Subject: [Asrg] spam down?
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 13:39:15 -0000

There was a little side box in the current Economist that spam was
down from 80+% to 67% and credited it to, among other things
"sophisticated authentication" which I assume means DKIM and SPF.

First is there actual evidence that spam is on the wane? And if so,
does it actually have to due in part with authentication? I'd be
ecstatic to hear that the latter was true, but correlation is not
causation.

Mike