Re: [Asrg] Email service assumptions and making system-wide changes
Laird Breyer <laird@lbreyer.com> Thu, 19 January 2006 06:35 UTC
Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EzTOJ-0004rM-50; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 01:35:27 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EzTOD-0004qL-BV for asrg@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 01:35:21 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA23825 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 01:33:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from omta05ps.mx.bigpond.com ([144.140.83.195]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EzTWf-0002Nr-6v for asrg@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 01:44:07 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([60.226.77.129]) by omta05ps.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20060119063454.LULV14751.omta05ps.mx.bigpond.com@localhost.localdomain> for <asrg@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 06:34:54 +0000
Received: from ender (ender.scoobynet [192.168.0.3]) by localhost.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 471F8C0 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 16:42:06 +1000 (EST)
Received: by ender (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 661644DD8D; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 16:33:34 +1000 (EST)
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 16:33:33 +1000
From: Laird Breyer <laird@lbreyer.com>
To: asrg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Email service assumptions and making system-wide changes
Message-ID: <20060119063333.GA2368@ender>
Mail-Followup-To: asrg@ietf.org
References: <17356.38171.951736.912706@world.std.com> <OFFE10648F.FD8AB2E7-ON802570FA.0035C93C-802570FA.0035EABB@slc.co.uk> <17358.53777.280181.751442@world.std.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <17358.53777.280181.751442@world.std.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 2409bba43e9c8d580670fda8b695204a
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: laird@lbreyer.com
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: asrg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-bounces@ietf.org
On Jan 18 2006, Barry Shein wrote: > > On January 18, 2006 at 09:48 Danny_Angus@slc.co.uk (Danny Angus) wrote: > > > > > > > > > So by your reasoning we shouldn't have bothered to close the open > > > relays? > > > > A truly effective solution to the real problem would not *require* that > > open relays be closed, it would involve a transaction between the sender > > and the recipient, not impose a constraint on the transport layer. > > > > In other words, it'd find some other way to achieve the same effect of > closing open relays. No, I think what Danny means is that an effective solution needs to be end-to-end (RFC1958). Only the sender and recipient should be involved, the intervening network should only transport bits. I'm not sure an end-to-end censorship system is possible in an accept and forward infrastructure such as email, but maybe there's some kind of formal proof of that statement? I don't know. -- Laird Breyer. _______________________________________________ Asrg mailing list Asrg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
- [Asrg] Re: Bots Frank Ellermann
- [Asrg] Spam, why is it still a problem? Craig Cockburn
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, why is it still a problem? der Mouse
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, why is it still a problem? Tom Petch
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, why is it still a problem? Danny Angus
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, why is it still a problem? Andrew W. Donoho
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, why is it still a problem? Dave Crocker
- [Asrg] Re: Spam, why is it still a problem? Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, why is it still a problem? Barry Shein
- RE: [Asrg] Spam, why is it still a problem? Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, why is it still a problem? Seth Breidbart
- [Asrg] Email service assumptions and making syste… Dave Crocker
- Re: [Asrg] Email service assumptions and making s… Barry Shein
- [Asrg] Re: Email service assumptions and making s… Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Asrg] Email service assumptions and making s… Seth Breidbart
- Re: [Asrg] Email service assumptions and making s… Douglas Otis
- Re: [Asrg] Email service assumptions and making s… Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Email service assumptions and making s… Seth Breidbart
- [Asrg] Re: Spam, why is it still a problem? Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Spam, why is it still a problem? Gadi Evron
- [Asrg] Re: Spam, why is it still a problem? Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Spam, why is it still a problem? Tom Petch
- Bots was Re: [Asrg] Email service assumptions and… Tom Petch
- Re: [Asrg] Email service assumptions and making s… John Levine
- Re: Bots was Re: [Asrg] Email service assumptions… John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] Email service assumptions and making s… Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Email service assumptions and making s… Douglas Otis
- Re: Bots was Re: [Asrg] Email service assumptions… Barry Shein
- [Asrg] Re: Bots Frank Ellermann
- RE: [Asrg] Re: Bots Larry Seltzer
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Bots Douglas Otis
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Bots Seth Breidbart
- [Asrg] Re: Bots Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, why is it still a problem? Craig Cockburn
- [Asrg] Re: Bots Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Spam, why is it still a problem? Craig Cockburn
- RE: [Asrg] Re: Bots Larry Seltzer
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Bots Gadi Evron
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Spam, why is it still a problem? Douglas Otis
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, why is it still a problem? John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, why is it still a problem? Craig Cockburn
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Spam, why is it still a problem? Craig Cockburn
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, why is it still a problem? Danny Angus
- Re: [Asrg] Email service assumptions and making s… Danny Angus
- Re: [Asrg] Email service assumptions and making s… Danny Angus
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, why is it still a problem? John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, why is it still a problem? John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] Email service assumptions and making s… Seth Breidbart
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, why is it still a problem? Craig Cockburn
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, why is it still a problem? Bill Cole
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, why is it still a problem? John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, why is it still a problem? Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Email service assumptions and making s… Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Email service assumptions and making s… Laird Breyer
- [Asrg] Re: Email service assumptions and making s… Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Asrg] Email service assumptions and making s… Danny Angus
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, why is it still a problem? John Levine
- RE: [Asrg] Re: Spam, why is it still a problem? Wesley Peters
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, why is it still a problem? Dave Crocker
- Re: [Asrg] Email service assumptions and making s… Dave Crocker
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, why is it still a problem? Danny Angus