Re: [Asrg] An Anti-Spam Heuristic

John Leslie <john@jlc.net> Thu, 13 December 2012 19:02 UTC

Return-Path: <john@jlc.net>
X-Original-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B3E521F861B for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:02:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.164
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.164 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.435, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZKBl7CoU7JHe for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:02:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhost.jlc.net (mailhost.jlc.net [199.201.159.4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB1621F8619 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:02:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mailhost.jlc.net (Postfix, from userid 104) id 9562833D10; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:02:51 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:02:51 -0500
From: John Leslie <john@jlc.net>
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
Message-ID: <20121213190251.GE37893@verdi>
References: <SNT002-W143FB9A867C92FA80D90E04C54E0@phx.gbl> <20121213140359.GA2187@gsp.org> <121213072401.ZM29345@torch.brasslantern.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <121213072401.ZM29345@torch.brasslantern.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Subject: Re: [Asrg] An Anti-Spam Heuristic
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 19:02:52 -0000

Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> wrote:
> On Dec 13,  9:03am, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
>} [Adam Sobieski <adamsobieski@hotmail.com> wrote:]
>}
>}> A number of heuristics include increasing the computation required to
>}> send and receive an email, for example one to a few minutes of computation
>}> per email on desktop computers.
>} 
>} I don't think you can do this.  I think you're trying to drown someone
>} who owns the ocean, and that the attempt is futile.  But perhaps you have
>} an approach that's eluded others, that overcomes the obvious problems,
>} and I just don't see it yet due to insufficient caffeine intake.

   It's not sufficient to prove some value was expended: something of value
must be transferred to the receiving SMTP server (if not all the way to
the reader).

> Generating "cash" with computing resources means they can print all the
> money they want.  For a pay-to-play scheme to have any hope of working,
> it needs to be based on a resource that can be controlled from outside.

   I'm not sure "controlled from outside" can work...

> Which leads to the same discussion we had four years ago.  Today is the
> anniversary of http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-asrg-postage-00
> which never went went anywhere beyond that.

   Indeed it is, Bart! I'll treat you and Ben to a virtual beverage and
four virtual candles. ;^)

> It is acknowledged that the bad guys can steal postage from a zombied
> system almost as easily as they can steal compute resources, but it's
> easier to discover and react to the theft of something that doesn't
> invisibly regenerate.

   It's better yet to react to actual value received. ;^)

   The snail-mail systems _are_ sender-pays systems, but it's only the
perceived value-received that causes snail-mail recipients to open an
envelope.

   (I'm not holding my breath on anything happening with ePostage, but
I remain willing to work with anybody else with the energy to pursue it.)

--
John Leslie <john@jlc.net>