Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as a punishment
David Romerstein <hanov3r@gmail.com> Tue, 24 January 2012 15:29 UTC
Return-Path: <hanov3r@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 031AA21F86BB for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 24 Jan 2012 07:29:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hWtzFrWaaK5w for
<asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 07:29:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com
[209.85.212.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76F2D21F8678 for
<asrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 07:29:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by vbbfa15 with SMTP id fa15so1022282vbb.13 for <asrg@irtf.org>;
Tue, 24 Jan 2012 07:29:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=WlVnLIgLo+3Y9Ju/ACyAkjyH0TNc6C7vyoUXTHdh11Q=;
b=NGnHSiFBVeOZ7o2WTVjbctpratGyPCbrCdBMBhQsZbcl6ReEadXvKOaNtb/tgttQfZ
t3GsTxs9zPWf/QyJGdiiSObC0eQWBUuABDl5EWxcQK91qDL+gPw7qqmA/6lFxRtbTL3y
9oBnNLjYc3mjYHXdfDH8P0NKEbEkXsf07Q3hg=
Received: by 10.52.173.52 with SMTP id bh20mr6544536vdc.9.1327418977861;
Tue, 24 Jan 2012 07:29:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from h111.home.com (c-68-81-175-116.hsd1.pa.comcast.net.
[68.81.175.116]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id
ga9sm14606364vdc.15.2012.01.24.07.29.34 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Tue, 24 Jan 2012 07:29:37 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4F1ECE5A.5090500@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:29:30 -0500
From: David Romerstein <hanov3r@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: asrg@irtf.org
References: <18B53BA2A483AD45962AAD1397BE13253846E0FE87@UK-EXCHMBX1.green.sophos>
<4F1ECBE4.1050802@bofhland.org>
In-Reply-To: <4F1ECBE4.1050802@bofhland.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as a punishment
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/asrg>,
<mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>,
<mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:29:39 -0000
On 1/24/12 10:19 AM, Emanuele Balla (aka Skull) wrote: > In truth there's > in point 3.3: > > « Note: In Section 3.4, it is noted that some DNSBLs have shut down in > such a way to list all of the Internet. Further, in Section 3.5, > DNSBL operators MUST NOT list 127.0.0.1. Therefore, a positive > listing for 127.0.0.1 SHOULD indicate that the DNSBL has started > listing the world and is non-functional. » > > and again, in point 3.5: > > « A functioning DNSBL MUST NOT list 127.0.0.1. There are a number of > mail server implementations that do not cope with this well, and many > will use a positive response for 127.0.0.1 as an indication that the > DNSBL is shut down and listing the entire Internet.» "Listing 127.0.0.1" is not the same as "returning 127.0.0.1". -- D
- [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as a p… Martijn Grooten
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Emanuele Balla (aka Skull)
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… David Romerstein
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… David Romerstein
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Emanuele Balla (aka Skull)
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Rich Kulawiec
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Emanuele Balla (aka Skull)
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… darxus
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… David Romerstein
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… John R. Levine
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… David Romerstein
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Steve Atkins
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Dave Warren
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Emanuele Balla (aka Skull)
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Derek Diget
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Chris Lewis
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… SM
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Dave Warren
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… SM
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Douglas Otis
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… SM
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Paul Smith
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Brendan Hide
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Steve Atkins
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… SM
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Douglas Otis
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Dave Warren
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Dave Warren
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Douglas Otis