Re: [Asrg] DNSBL and IPv6

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Sun, 21 October 2012 22:44 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C23E21F8907 for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 15:44:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -111.744
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-111.744 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.455, BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4qXmXdLJ8LMy for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 15:44:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B6621F8868 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 15:44:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 23265 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2012 22:44:28 -0000
Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 21 Oct 2012 22:44:28 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info; s=50847acc.xn--9vv.k1208; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=5T19FhJ+KWo2XdTAmWo2I7k6p2MRcRxxBL0Rb770P3A=; b=uSiwkLPKH4miZfz9hUb+5RsXIGMG3sDbS2Ej3djIyd2jXMt3vui6wt/ivOyEN37ksJL/sYrdDKWvyAAX6rZmRZezySMvV/hWqU5EyhQJTXsHDxvlgrt1BT6840yw0tfQJASigaYP9a/+IlZv94vW1C3xS/j0mzAYfi1Jo3hjyIM=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info; s=50847acc.xn--9vv.k1208; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=5T19FhJ+KWo2XdTAmWo2I7k6p2MRcRxxBL0Rb770P3A=; b=0TUVVKebQeeGqB0ZOQ0XxecVZuGUR1iYUGV2TfRWWvC3S5TOucOMvtuWoI/Zq3uCGIDznY7wVHz7F7pLcGkUDTItmZE97r+ZWrripd5QsMupLOzHILVd2sOlgdS1XoGW/bBTmv0F0l3fhEzMQv+Eb3BkJj4jk7JSj5sjqfiH1lY=
VBR-Info: md=iecc.com; mc=all; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org
Date: 21 Oct 2012 22:44:06 -0000
Message-ID: <20121021224406.33236.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: asrg@irtf.org
In-Reply-To: <20121021212040.GE3248@hjp.at>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Asrg] DNSBL and IPv6
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 22:44:33 -0000

>> Probably not, although I'm waiting for ESPs to figure out that if they
>> send every message from a different IP,
>
>I thought of that but I wouldn't be surprised to overflow the router's
>ARP table

Well, yes, if you configure stuff in a naive way.  I'd route an entire
/64 to the mail server, and configure the server as its own router
with all of those IP addresses internally forwarded to a single IP
that talks to the outside world.  If you wanted to do IP hopping,
it wouldn't be hard to do.

>> it'll be much easier to process bounces and complaints since all
>> they'll need is the IP to figure out what the list and address was.
>
>Is it? For mailing-lists, I think VERP is simpler and more robust.

Depends what your intentions are.  If you're trying to do listwashing,
you may wall see DNSBL listings rather than bounces.  I like VERP just
fine and my lists use it, but I do get back FBL reports that are
munged to the point where I can't tell who complained.  But they
rarely munge the IP.

R's,
John