Re: [Asrg] Proposed corollary to Godwin's law

mathew <meta@pobox.com> Fri, 26 June 2009 00:27 UTC

Return-Path: <meta404@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 132A33A67E2 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:27:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gznY4vxtXDcG for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:27:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f223.google.com (mail-fx0-f223.google.com [209.85.220.223]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 277D43A6A12 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:27:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxm23 with SMTP id 23so667142fxm.7 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PJVuilfaXPnNYbqB053JzQ3E88OxzRFsDhEpAGdESfg=; b=P5T6GLyO6Utlc0K6WIjV4C4EBRwSlf0nXHjhqUHjIFirMKVPn46H7gWMjAVDzKMfCw dCHcB9jh0D2w5Jv2CH+eV05hua+64rO8QNGxvGqFrsF3efzGopVUDn1ReiRReyM1Xl2B D6gEQQssNUlsD0pJKx2UZWCWE5CbY5FjAb9a8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=bfuoY51BiQhd0+BTjpO8GRhW2AP5VvJS/mXDgdSstmZfwtSfWOdy4qOiPTAIUBqI7e hC8KNcSATvXxFDdQQ4ERRJxGSXaC72lGFYozNPQrySMdv6wj/3WAKtA5oqqG+TQxCBpS ZXJWt6VDUSGeWsOAfnr1AuXKnNw+vRuKDild0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: meta404@gmail.com
Received: by 10.223.114.74 with SMTP id d10mr2581115faq.87.1245975989611; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20090619100604.2572.qmail@simone.iecc.com>
References: <4A3B3335.6040507@tana.it> <20090619100604.2572.qmail@simone.iecc.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 19:26:29 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 656e1046611d1fb8
Message-ID: <7eeceb440906251726p217e1b2bse575f732d1aaafaf@mail.gmail.com>
From: mathew <meta@pobox.com>
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Proposed corollary to Godwin's law
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:27:34 -0000

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 05:06, John Levine<johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
> I think that as soon as you start quoting the dictionary, you've lost
> the argument.

Exactly what Humpty Dumpty would say. Glory!


mathew