Re: [Asrg] What are the IPs that sends mail for a domain?

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 29 June 2009 21:09 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3F7F28C2F0 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:09:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -19.175
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-19.175 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i3X9cnooqJ8W for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:09:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [208.31.42.53]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24DF28C2A6 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:09:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 99537 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2009 21:10:16 -0000
Received: from mail1.iecc.com (208.31.42.56) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 29 Jun 2009 21:10:16 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=k0906; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=P0T+yCXvRHyvBinMyzRcV6ZLtTGGk0pf1b6oZ22TG7c=; b=C3Q02qy3DPI1SBPEHITSuGJQ+9s1lL8VqXkt5u+UJzDj7J5Sd2Jplt3i3r6T2578YAQVKsPdvJCHgM1WlxJBCtD78DSHnHPSf/bguZNXLyH5OxgHpTPgymOu5YyEFxF/1MFg/BX1OU2nddLY26+PUz+vRzxLLqyHjCPzZ+WkWYw=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=k0906; bh=P0T+yCXvRHyvBinMyzRcV6ZLtTGGk0pf1b6oZ22TG7c=; b=fyk982bDrwPWtuw1ygei5W3byFkplPW2OKr0htusj5Fbobaqus1+31sOY7d11VtDjxyWsRW1hE6kP1HNfxjr4z6WxEGXDWNUKR2yJ+0MO37WHFC7Vbvg0fT7arI3bavDj+wcaDjj5RQiFt7CC2WFbwYi79ffCEB6HVZteeH5zpw=
Date: 29 Jun 2009 21:10:16 -0000
Message-ID: <20090629211016.60522.qmail@simone.iecc.com>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: asrg@irtf.org
In-Reply-To: <4A490CC5.8020601@billmail.scconsult.com>
Organization:
Cc:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Asrg] What are the IPs that sends mail for a domain?
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:09:57 -0000

>The reasons that younger MUA's do not offer that are social, not technical. 
>It has never been particularly difficult technically for a MUA to work 
>without a smarthost/MSA, ...

Well, for fairly loose definitions of "work", since I've never seen an MUA
that did retries on soft failure.

Now the question is essentially moot, since any legitimate mail sent direct
from an MUA is swamped in the flood from bots.

R's,
John