[Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...

Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com> Tue, 03 June 2003 23:40 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA00278 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 19:40:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h53NdkL08769 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 19:39:46 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h53NdjB08766 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 19:39:45 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA00257; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 19:39:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19NLLn-00044f-00; Tue, 03 Jun 2003 19:37:55 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=www1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19NLLm-00044c-00; Tue, 03 Jun 2003 19:37:54 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h53NblB08604; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 19:37:47 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h53NXWB07590 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 19:33:32 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA00087 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 19:33:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19NLFm-00041W-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2003 19:31:42 -0400
Received: from pcls1.std.com ([199.172.62.103] helo=TheWorld.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19NLFl-00041S-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2003 19:31:41 -0400
Received: from world.std.com (jeanie@world-f.std.com [199.172.62.5]) by TheWorld.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h53NXS9O014284 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 19:33:28 -0400
Received: (from bzs@localhost) by world.std.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA18571; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 19:33:28 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200306032333.TAA18571@world.std.com>
From: Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>
To: asrg@ietf.org
Subject: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 19:33:28 -0400

I've been thinking about the various definitions of "spam" and thought
of another criteria which isn't necessarily mutually exclusive but
captures something important:

  Spam is e-mail from a source which is hard to impossible for
  the recipient to stop and/or reasonably prevent from receiving.

I think the loss of control is very much at the heart of spam and many
other attempts at definition dance around this somewhat.

We could add the usual unwanted, unauthorized qualifications to that
(I may not want to hear from my sysadmin but s/he's authorized, etc.)
but it would just make this note much longer and I think it's enough
to toss out the basic idea.

-- 
        -Barry Shein

Software Tool & Die    | bzs@TheWorld.com           | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 617-739-0202        | Login: 617-739-WRLD
The World              | Public Access Internet     | Since 1989     *oo*
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg