Re: [Asrg] various anti-spam techniques, was misconception in SPF

Christian Grunfeld <christian.grunfeld@gmail.com> Sat, 08 December 2012 00:18 UTC

Return-Path: <christian.grunfeld@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0254A21F8BB6 for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 16:18:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, MANGLED_SPAM=2.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tn4--PdBixAp for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 16:18:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-f176.google.com (mail-ie0-f176.google.com [209.85.223.176]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B206221F8BAE for <asrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 16:18:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f176.google.com with SMTP id 13so3243246iea.21 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 16:18:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=fg+k1x3ZELyAqU5FS/BaUQfDTo+ng1cwsQxNtZqVacc=; b=Zd//7wraaK+jnDjxpohiJ2YeIs5utgk6LKfh7shwNNXD+qBTL54dNq4QhBo4CKNTkE VUaj8/ucR0yrGaewWm5ZgCMXAEXP6gltDcAd5wKptF/XXnTSkVBGHLRMqAPEZJBpw2Dv AncvE5rW1H/Y7cRsPYk8SVkNpeLg+0oe/0BsNktg1BQPs92Ru2pTmapDmWniFCkgEyhy Mx8PYXNZEqJVdiamditFL+ODCNeR/0x5bkli5l3usLkh4+zJJuetghnoZ3jcFhiONQ1P AU2MfIEQoqMffHB0uRabv7Anxg+GW9/SAN3wpjbPB2dNEWQvW5yr6Q8QyAKtWRemB1yJ jN6Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.187.197 with SMTP id fu5mr672566igc.70.1354925904108; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 16:18:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.231.65.79 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 16:18:23 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20121207205003.18391.qmail@joyce.lan>
References: <50C244A6.1040402@pscs.co.uk> <20121207205003.18391.qmail@joyce.lan>
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:18:23 -0300
Message-ID: <CAFduga=oVCkXq_S9s7yFwO-m-+J8gLO-HQV=KQV3qDs3zqqoFg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Christian Grunfeld <christian.grunfeld@gmail.com>
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [Asrg] various anti-spam techniques, was misconception in SPF
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2012 00:18:26 -0000

2012/12/7 John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>:

> PS: The wiki at http://wiki.asrg.sp.am has a taxonomy of anti-spam
> techniques, both the good and the bad.  See if your favorite or least
> favorite is listed there, and if not, please add it.  If you don't
> have a login to edit, just drop me a note and I'll give you one.


John, I didn't find spamtraps or honeypots.....may be I didn't dig
enough the wiki