RE: [Asrg] Economic methods for controlling spam (was [Yet anothe r] article on spam)

"Eric D. Williams" <eric@infobro.com> Sat, 24 May 2003 01:48 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA03491 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 23 May 2003 21:48:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h4O1m7N18578 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 23 May 2003 21:48:07 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4O1m7B18575 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Fri, 23 May 2003 21:48:07 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA03477; Fri, 23 May 2003 21:47:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19JO7G-0004UZ-00; Fri, 23 May 2003 21:46:34 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=www1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19JO7F-0004UW-00; Fri, 23 May 2003 21:46:33 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4O1kVB18468; Fri, 23 May 2003 21:46:31 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4O1j3B18423 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Fri, 23 May 2003 21:45:03 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA03419 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 May 2003 21:44:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19JO4J-0004So-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Fri, 23 May 2003 21:43:31 -0400
Received: from black.infobro.com ([63.71.25.39] helo=infobro.com) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 19JO4I-0004S4-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Fri, 23 May 2003 21:43:30 -0400
Received: from red (unverified [207.199.136.153]) by infobro.com (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id <B0002609333@infobro.com>; Fri, 23 May 2003 21:41:34 -0400
Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Fri, 23 May 2003 21:41:37 -0400
Message-ID: <01C32174.16B37B10.eric@infobro.com>
From: "Eric D. Williams" <eric@infobro.com>
To: 'Paul Judge' <paul.judge@ciphertrust.com>, 'Yakov Shafranovich' <research@solidmatrix.com>, "'asrg@ietf.org'" <asrg@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [Asrg] Economic methods for controlling spam (was [Yet anothe r] article on spam)
Organization: Information Brokers, Inc.
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 21:27:24 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Friday, May 23, 2003 4:10 PM, Paul Judge [SMTP:paul.judge@ciphertrust.com] 
wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Yakov Shafranovich [mailto:research@solidmatrix.com]
> > Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 3:20 PM
> > To: asrg@ietf.org
> > Subject: [Asrg] Economic methods for controlling spam (was
> > [Yet another] article on spam)
> >
> >
> > At 06:13 AM 5/23/2003 +0900, Shannon Jacobs wrote:
> >
> > >However, with email we have the potential to do much better if we
> > >devise the proper economic model. Right now the spammers are
> > forcing us to spend additional money handling their spam. More machines for 
> > >filtering.
8<...>8
> > Perhaps we can start a discussion about the economic models
> > of spam control and various systems possible. Below is a quote
> > from section  1.7. of Dave Crocker's draft on spam control
> > mechanims
 (http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-crocker-spam-techconsider-01.txt)
> ,
> >we can start off discussion with this:
>
8<...>8
> One such system was presented at the ASRG meeting at IETF 56. The system is
> called SHRED:  http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/03mar/slides/asrg-8.pdf. If
> we are going to start a dicussion about cost-based systems, then we should
> start we the thought that has been put into this proposal.

I agree.

> According to our taxonomy, these approaches can be considered a form of
> consent token or a response of charging after spam detection depending on
> the use.

Which is why I am forwarding this suggestion.  It may also be appropriate to 
explore the synergism of 'filtering' and such a system.

Of course that would be apropos of the Filtering draft.

-e
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg