Re: [Asrg] draft-irtf-asrg-criteria (was Re: request for review for a non FUSSP proposal)

Claudio Telmon <claudio@telmon.org> Mon, 29 June 2009 10:41 UTC

Return-Path: <claudio@telmon.org>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D442D3A6D6F for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:41:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.174, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yjqsZxXvqRys for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:41:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slim-2a.inet.it (slim-2a.inet.it [213.92.5.122]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7550D3A6D5B for <asrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:41:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 88-149-251-208.dynamic.ngi.it ([::ffff:88.149.251.208]) by slim-2a.inet.it via I-SMTP-5.6.0-560 id ::ffff:88.149.251.208+l3pMYuiAQm; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:41:58 +0200
Message-ID: <4A489A75.7060005@telmon.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:41:57 +0200
From: Claudio Telmon <claudio@telmon.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090318 Lightning/0.8 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
References: <4A43B696.2000106@cybernothing.org> <4A449A7C.6070106@tana.it> <20090626100736.GA29159@gsp.org> <4A44A90A.9090503@tana.it> <20090626140320.B0C8C24300@panix5.panix.com> <4A44F103.7010608@tana.it> <11FD07CCCE54CCC7FB8A2513@lewes.staff.uscs.susx.ac.uk> <4A48958D.7020701@tana.it>
In-Reply-To: <4A48958D.7020701@tana.it>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Asrg] draft-irtf-asrg-criteria (was Re: request for review for a non FUSSP proposal)
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:41:40 -0000

Alessandro Vesely wrote:

> Let me exemplify: my email address is on my town's public directory, and
> some used cars sellers want to advertise by email special deals in each
> town. An interpretation of "privacy" may imply that when the sellers
> copy my address into their list, at the same time notify me the details
> of their data processing. I don't want an email for that notification,
> just a machine readable note at my MX server. That note should arrive
> _before_ any email message, so that I can automatically delete my
> address from the sellers' list even before they send me any
> advertisement, if that's how I've configured the server.

This is another interesting example of "consent". Now, suppose that the
"details" require some lines of free text description, so that you can
properly decide if you like "how and why" they are using your address.
There, you have a consent request.
But the problem is, spammers won't be that polite, not even in Europe
with our EU Directive :) So you will need to find a way to enforce
compliance with this requirement for your address, that is, a way for
the MTA to know who you authorized...

-- 

Claudio Telmon
claudio@telmon.org
http://www.telmon.org