Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as a punishment
David Romerstein <hanov3r@gmail.com> Tue, 24 January 2012 15:28 UTC
Return-Path: <hanov3r@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 0AA3F21F8665 for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 24 Jan 2012 07:28:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DaEQR2DvF11Z for
<asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 07:28:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com
[209.85.220.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D0BD21F865C for
<asrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 07:28:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by vcbfl17 with SMTP id fl17so4236120vcb.13 for <asrg@irtf.org>;
Tue, 24 Jan 2012 07:28:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=H2WQuy0kFgAAZ61u9OWxBbtl4AXCevWj7EG+t/cc214=;
b=YueZzBFjB0/igXBdH/ITNP843DmLmyrHMDsPx3ENKHf7Tpkvkoi+S1uiKO/YwtGYoM
2StXBXeaDjOViofNDs6I40WvunRageHxxmTlLKZT9FomRYG65niuBTvgfUmHGd/Pp07X
kND59vVdxGcm4Cu2ZP0NakydKcpCLQ5Ecpgok=
Received: by 10.220.38.5 with SMTP id z5mr7368207vcd.63.1327418910792;
Tue, 24 Jan 2012 07:28:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from h111.home.com (c-68-81-175-116.hsd1.pa.comcast.net.
[68.81.175.116]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id
fj4sm14589633vdb.22.2012.01.24.07.28.27 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Tue, 24 Jan 2012 07:28:29 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4F1ECE0D.1090702@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:28:13 -0500
From: David Romerstein <hanov3r@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: asrg@irtf.org
References: <18B53BA2A483AD45962AAD1397BE13253846E0FE87@UK-EXCHMBX1.green.sophos>
In-Reply-To: <18B53BA2A483AD45962AAD1397BE13253846E0FE87@UK-EXCHMBX1.green.sophos>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as a punishment
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/asrg>,
<mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>,
<mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:28:32 -0000
On 1/24/12 10:07 AM, Martijn Grooten wrote:
> I was just wondering whether the RFC says anything about this kind of behaviour ('listing' everything as a punishment). To my reading it doesn't.
Only thing in the RFC close to this is 3.4, regarding shutting down
gracefully (MUST NOT list the entire Internet).
Listing the world for folks overloading your system is unlikely to have
the effect that you want, and is most likely going to impact folks who
have no say in the configuration of the receiving mail server.
-- D, who was just investigating a spate of URIBL-related blocks
yesterday...
- [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as a p… Martijn Grooten
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Emanuele Balla (aka Skull)
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… David Romerstein
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… David Romerstein
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Emanuele Balla (aka Skull)
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Rich Kulawiec
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Emanuele Balla (aka Skull)
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… darxus
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… David Romerstein
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… John R. Levine
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… David Romerstein
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Steve Atkins
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Dave Warren
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Emanuele Balla (aka Skull)
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Derek Diget
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Chris Lewis
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… SM
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Dave Warren
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… SM
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Douglas Otis
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… SM
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Paul Smith
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Brendan Hide
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Steve Atkins
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… SM
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Douglas Otis
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Dave Warren
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Dave Warren
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Douglas Otis