Re: [Asrg] DNSBL and IPv6

Matthias Leisi <matthias@leisi.net> Thu, 25 October 2012 12:35 UTC

Return-Path: <matthias@leisi.net>
X-Original-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06A8C21F8A0A for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 05:35:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.777
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.777 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CZnZHmVCoILM for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 05:35:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-f54.google.com (mail-oa0-f54.google.com [209.85.219.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5A821F8A01 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 05:35:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id n9so1971485oag.13 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 05:35:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=zHGnC09Nca9RjWsCSV2h83iCm8Sr6TlRLU6hmVCKRl0=; b=Kf60toTx5GJp55lK3miQl+MtN/subX3aY/nIOct6FRYRZWtRzPuyDuvn8vNxaxcUWU GE6IDw543DLitxYWZOyeqHWZ1fDcA9Ez55j2S1a6Uv+sYZsgofVhm5/seYFuzdla/NkN HqizEyH6e8l/Sru9gaumEWPwzQ4SElqTxWR/QSoNggTHg0Up/PVyqnfmqo4fkuDWITas HabX/LcCtgsTSBL9gkuy1zDFIv7LdJK/FSeDBbXmjbjj75c6Gv1V2m8f1MslJ79vO/c+ 4kcv3XkSgGWu7segXfoS7ghXUZKlwjlJOnL/dalhooqNudyygU5ZGOt9udl/i8bwoBRV VWUA==
Received: by 10.182.194.70 with SMTP id hu6mr15601139obc.4.1351168550672; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 05:35:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.76.3.173 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 05:35:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <0D79787962F6AE4B84B2CC41FC957D0B0D22655F@abn-exch1b.green.sophos>
References: <20121025024859.3176.qmail@joyce.lan> <A6AF6224-421E-4483-834B-A1F658BEC7C6@blighty.com> <50891887.50103@pscs.co.uk> <0D79787962F6AE4B84B2CC41FC957D0B0D22655F@abn-exch1b.green.sophos>
From: Matthias Leisi <matthias@leisi.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:35:30 +0200
Message-ID: <CALgnk9ph_KaOfJgABXVtBEoftH3sJ8Z2zsdVieH-ojESyXnMug@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmnvAmVKid7pXZps6f6SY211cOyP5iPNiXTmjMMo+1IUVQf2KxVyhvx2LKg4tgu2UFvxnEj
Subject: Re: [Asrg] DNSBL and IPv6
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 12:35:52 -0000

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Martijn Grooten
<martijn.grooten@virusbtn.com> wrote:

> I haven't really seen a suggestion on how to run IPv6-based blacklists that convinced me. (That's a rather unscientific claim, I know. I'd love for people to help John with his simulation so that we get a better idea; note that he doesn't need IPv6 data. I'm afraid I don't have the required data myself.)

I'm obviously biased since I run dnswl.org, but an IPv6-based
whitelist may work better than an IPv6-based blacklist. Enumerating
the goodness is generally easier than enumerating the badness.

(Of course, all IPv6-DNSxLs have the same risk of caches blowing up if
not done right, and the "done right" thing has not been defined yet).

-- Matthias