Re: [Asrg] The Real Problem

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Thu, 13 December 2012 16:12 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AEAA21F8617 for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 08:12:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.719
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.719 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8EL6d4NUtr3O for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 08:12:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (www.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6DF821F883C for <asrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 08:12:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=beta; t=1355415161; bh=ZzJ/CQo7nSZdYcTVEyYkN4THviFqo9TYzFpOlASctEA=; l=775; h=Date:From:To:References:In-Reply-To; b=i9by70HZmb9fGAOXKsVOSux8A6YaeOplxKXbQ9AjX+mVNgfSIBaL4N0RagYBhMQoP 6BHhlZNj5LJhBss4n2YgtBB75JcEqUzFKiqptwI1WD64534ni94N21o7z34rcvbCGr qSFpe3GbUA9xNcVb2Z4m9rs7Gchq38op6+736TiM=
Received: from [172.25.197.158] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.158]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:12:41 +0100 id 00000000005DC039.0000000050C9FE79.0000120F
Message-ID: <50C9FE79.7010005@tana.it>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:12:41 +0100
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: asrg@irtf.org
References: <SNT002-W1393526B62C0940EF697B2C54E0@phx.gbl> <20121213054358.17733.qmail@joyce.lan> <20121213091813.GA13311@mx1.yitter.info> <50C9F465.7000408@mustelids.ca>
In-Reply-To: <50C9F465.7000408@mustelids.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Asrg] The Real Problem
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:12:44 -0000

On Thu 13/Dec/2012 16:29:41 +0100 Chris Lewis wrote:
> On 12-12-13 04:18 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>> 
>> If we only knew who it was doing the lookups, we could use the
>> existing legal systems to solve these issues.
> 
> And even if you did know, what makes you think the existing legal
> system will always be able to help?

That's something we should make pretty clear, for the sake of the
Internet revolution, digital era, and all that sort:  If we need to
call the cops to deal with plain spam, we can give up that quest
altogether.

We MUST be able to achieve the total elimination of spam (1) using
only our puters and remote cooperation.  For the time being, we have
some difficulties just defining the term, but there's plenty of time
to improve :-)