[Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam
"Chui Tey" <teyc@cognoware.com> Mon, 19 May 2003 00:01 UTC
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA20913 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Sun, 18 May 2003 20:01:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h4INTgL14849 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 18 May 2003 19:29:42 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4INTgB14846 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Sun, 18 May 2003 19:29:42 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA20891; Sun, 18 May 2003 20:00:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19HY6e-00062e-00; Sun, 18 May 2003 20:02:20 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=www1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19HY6e-00062b-00; Sun, 18 May 2003 20:02:20 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4INP8B14759; Sun, 18 May 2003 19:25:08 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4INO7B14724 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Sun, 18 May 2003 19:24:07 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA20851 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 May 2003 19:54:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19HY1F-000622-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Sun, 18 May 2003 19:56:45 -0400
Received: from [210.18.214.26] (helo=WEBSERVER.advdata.com.au) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19HY1E-00061n-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Sun, 18 May 2003 19:56:44 -0400
Received: from SDG02 ([203.55.10.62]) by WEBSERVER.advdata.com.au with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.4905); Mon, 19 May 2003 09:59:13 +1000
From: Chui Tey <teyc@cognoware.com>
To: asrg@ietf.org
Message-ID: <004301c31d99$6e777470$3e0a37cb@advdata.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Importance: Normal
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 May 2003 23:59:13.0705 (UTC) FILETIME=[7B94B190:01C31D99]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 09:58:51 +1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Shannon's email caught my attention. The following is a link to his article, published on the ACM. http://www.acm.org/ubiquity/views/s_jacobs_2.html I don't really get what he is trying to say though. He seems to think the server already knows what is spam and what isn't. This just isn't the case. There are some forum discussions as well. http://campus.acm.org/forums/ubiquity/messageview.cfm?catid=5&threadid=67 The article also links to the Spam combat page. This is a useful page for ASRG subscribers who need a bit of background what's doable to trace and identify spam http://combat.uxn.com/. Warning: The discussions are of a pretty low quality, compared to what runs on this list. I think increasingly we have to assume that messages will be filtered, whether it is through ORBs at the server level, or at the message level, like Spam-Assassin. As filter settings get tweaked up, we will be unable to control/find out whether our legitimate emails have been delivered or not. Assuming that we live in a landscape where 99% of emails are spam, how do we identify that our outgoing emails are legitimate? We need a standard way to signal: a) Please let this mail through. It is important to me. I have expended X amount of effort or money, here's the proof. b) If your filter refused to let this mail through, please notify me so that I can try another method. This is important to me. I have expended X amount of effort or money, here's the proof. c) Please let this mail through, I would like to permit the SMTP server to publish my IP address on the email so that the recipients filter could verify that I am not a spammer. Micropayments made to a charitable organisation could be a worthly goal. Perhaps, organisations such as Medicines San Frontiers could sign our messages on a per receiver basis, or issue one-use tickets? This is just so that we could get our emails through if we are corresponding with a new party for the first time. _______________________________________________ Asrg mailing list Asrg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
- [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam Chui Tey
- Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam Shannon Jacobs
- Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam Shannon Jacobs
- Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam John Fenley
- Re: [Asrg] [Yet another] article on spam Shannon Jacobs
- [Asrg] Economic methods for controlling spam (was… Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam Kee Hinckley
- [Asrg] Re: Pay-for-attention (Was Re: article on … mathew
- [Asrg] Re: Pay-for-attention (Was Re: article on … Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Pay-for-attention (Was Re: article… Mitch Wagner