Re: [Asrg] TMGRS, Adding a spam button to MUAs

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 11 December 2009 23:19 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94FCB3A68C7 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:19:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -19.004
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-19.004 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.039, BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION=0.156]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4cD-WBClitdz for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:19:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [208.31.42.53]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9552F3A6937 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:19:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 78671 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2009 23:19:19 -0000
Received: from mail1.iecc.com (208.31.42.56) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 11 Dec 2009 23:19:19 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=k0912; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=Lx1+fFk6vVuo9aiBcJqzSZMmfwqWlQczAUjGhyZhadk=; b=HOXUTasOn+23pHxo0udcFsqVG3TtYEirelffnPl7DqoRLy+6FGb1z+cET5e0GQFZLFFZu+iURln1eP/QrdwBZe4JJfs7blHGzZDReetRzBfJATvsNq7sjrQ+0yWlcnn9I4Dc19bdg/IvubGGO1nLFnhFM8SUIFHsSu0zvY326tM=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=k0912; bh=Lx1+fFk6vVuo9aiBcJqzSZMmfwqWlQczAUjGhyZhadk=; b=XdKBtEBisSgR52vE5uWMlcOSSloYpwA0/yVC3MGDoBlIkyZGW6f3AWJXlFfk4QFmwA4JoK7Ic47TLo/n0nMJ04Lt8ittr0FWUHIp84OWjgqgZMIYQKeLam2twCoOWHTcSYHWjDO5I0L9Pda+boyF8hwA/G6qEzJDiI2sbA+vYWY=
Date: 11 Dec 2009 23:19:17 -0000
Message-ID: <20091211231917.34561.qmail@simone.iecc.com>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: asrg@irtf.org
In-Reply-To: <4B220B36.5090509@tana.it>
Organization:
Cc:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Asrg] TMGRS, Adding a spam button to MUAs
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 23:19:33 -0000

In article <4B220B36.5090509@tana.it> you write:
>>> I thought such _mythical global reputation system_ is what we are 
>>> researching right now.
>>
>> No, but if you'd like to set up a reputation system subgroup, that
>> would be fine.
>
>You mean setting up an ASRG subgroup? Of course I'd like to, it'd 
>be... well, mythical: the missing link between authentication and 
>reliability. It would be terrific to contribute that.
>
>Would a new group boost discussions and possibly result in some 
>practical outcome? I'd count Doug's refinement as a +1.

If at least three people say they're interested, I'll set up a list
for it.

R's,
John