Re: [Asrg] Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3)

Derek Diget <derek.diget+asrg@wmich.edu> Sun, 07 February 2010 02:17 UTC

Return-Path: <derek.diget+asrg@wmich.edu>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC6028C133 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 18:17:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.832
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.832 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.767, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i7bwhRkOWnW1 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 18:17:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx-tmp.wmich.edu (mx-tmp.wmich.edu [141.218.1.43]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D59243A7140 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 18:17:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Received: from spaz.oit.wmich.edu (spaz.oit.wmich.edu [141.218.24.51]) by mta01.service.private (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 64bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0KXG0041K939OIC0@mta01.service.private> for asrg@irtf.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2010 21:18:47 -0500 (EST)
X-WMU-Spam: Gauge=X, Probability=10% on Sat Feb 6 21:18:47 2010, Report=' WMU_MSA_SMTP+ 0, TO_IN_SUBJECT 0.5, BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_700_799 0, FROM_EDU_TLD 0, SPF_NEUTRAL 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __FRAUD_REFNUM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __PHISH_SPEAR_STRUCTURE_1 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __URI_NS '
X-WMU-PMX-Version: 5.5.9.388399, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2010.2.7.20325 - Sat Feb 6 21:18:45 2010
Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2010 21:18:45 -0500 (EST)
From: Derek Diget <derek.diget+asrg@wmich.edu>
X-X-Sender: diget@spaz.oit.wmich.edu
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
In-reply-to: <4B6DB6D1.5050805@dcrocker.net>
Message-id: <Pine.GSO.4.62.1002062117540.11995@spaz.oit.wmich.edu>
References: <4B6C6D35.1050101@nortel.com> <4B6D41E3.8000209@tana.it> <4B6DAD0C.3020109@nortel.com> <4B6DB6D1.5050805@dcrocker.net>
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3)
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 02:17:57 -0000

On Feb 6, 2010 at 10:37 -0800, Dave CROCKER wrote:
=>But perhaps the presence of rough consensus needs to be determined explicitly.
=>
=>Would folks please respond to the list with their preference:
=>     Reports should be submitted using a mechanisms that:
=>     [1]  Is the same as for submitting regular new mail, that is, normal
=>          posting.  (Determination of the address to send to is a separate
=>          issue.)

+1


-- 
***********************************************************************
Derek Diget                            Office of Information Technology
Western Michigan University - Kalamazoo  Michigan  USA - www.wmich.edu/
***********************************************************************