Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as a punishment
David Romerstein <hanov3r@gmail.com> Tue, 24 January 2012 18:59 UTC
Return-Path: <hanov3r@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 4B12E21F851B for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:59:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vEnnAA138NYW for
<asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:59:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com
[209.85.212.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE4BA21F851A for
<asrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:59:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by vbbfa15 with SMTP id fa15so1289652vbb.13 for <asrg@irtf.org>;
Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:59:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=doKF58TUPyyfK02ognLiDRf+G/nhtclmZ0nfUSn8SPU=;
b=id429poC23g209w6OGzULqrZVpcQAxDYXoSa3LLF6FubM1lVNLkTf6uK2sOymVSs72
LkIYeEJVZiF95hnkHhJ49IdOibd7uTmnQRziJUsDCfzrOz5tZsUqMQZkvKrLf2AmcCHz
z3SHYXZmcMouJGh0/oYA6PRFhFDV+OWh2H02w=
Received: by 10.52.174.51 with SMTP id bp19mr6344634vdc.102.1327431588328;
Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:59:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from h111.home.com (c-68-81-175-116.hsd1.pa.comcast.net.
[68.81.175.116]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id
jr10sm15312669vdb.14.2012.01.24.10.59.46 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:59:47 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4F1EFFA1.1050505@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:59:45 -0500
From: David Romerstein <hanov3r@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: asrg@irtf.org
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1201241349500.96225@joyce.lan>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1201241349500.96225@joyce.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as a punishment
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/asrg>,
<mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>,
<mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:59:49 -0000
On 1/24/12 1:50 PM, John R. Levine wrote: >> Listing the world for folks overloading your system is unlikely to have >> the effect that you want, and is most likely going to impact folks who >> have no say in the configuration of the receiving mail server. > > You may be right, but I have to have some sympathy for BL operators who > are getting bombed by clueless misconfigurations. I do not, in any way, disagree with this. I'm just wondering if there's a middle ground that can stop BL operators from being abused by (willfully or unwillfully) clueless folks without severely impacting innocent users. Something more than "just sit back and take all those stupid queries" and less than "return a response code that could indicate a listing for every one of those stupid queries". -- D
- [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as a p… Martijn Grooten
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Emanuele Balla (aka Skull)
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… David Romerstein
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… David Romerstein
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Emanuele Balla (aka Skull)
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Rich Kulawiec
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Emanuele Balla (aka Skull)
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… darxus
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… David Romerstein
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… John R. Levine
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… David Romerstein
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Steve Atkins
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Dave Warren
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Emanuele Balla (aka Skull)
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Derek Diget
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Chris Lewis
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… SM
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Dave Warren
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… SM
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Douglas Otis
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… SM
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Paul Smith
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Brendan Hide
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Steve Atkins
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… SM
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Douglas Otis
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Dave Warren
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Dave Warren
- Re: [Asrg] RFC 6471 and "listing the Internet" as… Douglas Otis