IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button idea is pre-failed

Paul Russell <prussell@nd.edu> Thu, 04 March 2010 14:16 UTC

Return-Path: <prussell@nd.edu>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C8E3A8CAB for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 06:16:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.954
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.954 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION=0.156]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lMbGgRH1WoNk for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 06:16:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx-p2.cc.nd.edu (mx-p2.cc.nd.edu [129.74.250.58]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76FC33A8191 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 06:16:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mta-2.cc.nd.edu (mta-2.cc.nd.edu [129.74.250.37]) by mx-p2.cc.nd.edu (Switch-3.3.0/Switch-3.3.0) with ESMTP id o24EH23k003365 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <asrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 09:17:03 -0500
Received: from [172.19.226.36] (nat20.cc.nd.edu [129.74.4.120]) (authenticated bits=0) by mta-2.cc.nd.edu (Switch-3.3.0/Switch-3.3.0) with ESMTP id o24EG60m003480 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <asrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 09:16:06 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4B8FC0A6.3060903@nd.edu>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 09:16:06 -0500
From: Paul Russell <prussell@nd.edu>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
References: <20100302131810.GA22938@gsp.org> <4B8D3FD1.8090403@nortel.com> <BF533A28DBE487489EAB3411C5412CBE1032EE5B@BD01MSXMB015.US.Cingular.Net> <41D5397E-E5B8-4508-9393-E25CB307641F@thenose.net>
In-Reply-To: <41D5397E-E5B8-4508-9393-E25CB307641F@thenose.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Source-IP: 129.74.250.37
X-ND-MTA-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 09:17:03 EST
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Summary/outline of why the junk button idea is pre-failed
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:16:10 -0000

On 3/4/2010 08:59, Dennis Dayman wrote:
> Interesting article
> 
> http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=123574
>

The author is not interested in reducing or eliminating spam; he simply wants
tools to validate his delusion that his spam is not spam.

-- 
Paul Russell, Senior Systems Administrator
OIT Messaging Services Team
University of Notre Dame

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email