[Asrg] SPF's helo identity as a reporting target

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Sat, 12 May 2012 08:41 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B426221F8600 for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 May 2012 01:41:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.409
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.409 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.090, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245, J_CHICKENPOX_41=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_44=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_48=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_64=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sTTTzkST12s4 for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 May 2012 01:41:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (www.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B413821F85F6 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Sat, 12 May 2012 01:41:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=test; t=1336809596; bh=qxbRyuBQYUzSKmced4wwxJ0l3WQNvHaRUt1wLvc/Uqk=; l=1283; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=TPDae/SzUoakAuhTypOJjXbh+d41gZMiHiBCEq7Bf9X/toY3b8QiWaNzHYEkycLqh O+ibKZOrsUKL2T978RHGVKcL5SX1itBc9QpJCK+zS2TU2L0B0KLnChkNQsopMfnEL4 ueheu/joAXw1iLWx2exbIBnveFp+yHUgN3rgH9cI=
Received: from [172.25.197.158] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.158]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 515, TLS: TLS1.0,256bits,RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA; Sat, 12 May 2012 09:59:56 +0200 id 00000000005DC033.000000004FAE187C.000054DB
Message-ID: <4FAE187B.9030902@tana.it>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 09:59:55 +0200
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
References: <4FA8FBCA.3050904@tana.it>
In-Reply-To: <4FA8FBCA.3050904@tana.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Asrg] SPF's helo identity as a reporting target
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 08:41:03 -0000

This probably belongs to ASRG, not only because MARF has finished, but
also because a *Taxonomy of reporting targets* should be hosted
somewhere, and I'm unable to think of a better place than this list's
wiki.

Opinions?

-------- Original Message --------
From: vesely@tana.it
Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 12:56:10 +0200
To: marf@ietf.org
Subject: SPF's helo identity as a reporting target

Hi all,

someone on the spf-discuss list noted that the smtp.helo is often of a
different type than the domains usually branded in smtp.mailfrom,
header.from, and dkim.d.  That's because it seems to be quite common
to outsource mail relaying as well as MX services.  This situation
characterizes relaying services as third parties that might manage
complaints and/or enforce policies, much like ESPs and ISPs.

MARF-AS generically allows any "domain that has been verified by the
[relevant] authentication mechanism", as well as "Abuse addresses in
WHOIS records of the IP address".

Would it be feasible to correlate auth methods' properties to roles,
in general?  For example, ESPs normally wouldn't outsource mail
relaying, since it's their core business.  Thus, sending a complaint
to abuse@_smtp.helo_ could be a way to target any involved ESP.

Just mumbling...