RE: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2 (was: Implicit Consent (was: Another criteria for "what is spam"...))
"Peter Kay" <peter@titankey.com> Fri, 06 June 2003 02:06 UTC
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA25242 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 22:06:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h56262Q30825 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 22:06:02 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h56262B30822 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 22:06:02 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA25237; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 22:05:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19O6aL-0005Mv-00; Thu, 05 Jun 2003 22:04:05 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=www1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19O6aL-0005Ms-00; Thu, 05 Jun 2003 22:04:05 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h561v3B30548; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 21:57:03 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h561udB30518 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 21:56:39 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA25103 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 21:56:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19O6RG-0005LF-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2003 21:54:42 -0400
Received: from imail.centuryc.net ([216.30.168.20] helo=isp-appsvr01.centuryc.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19O6RG-0005LB-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2003 21:54:42 -0400
Received: from cybercominc.com [66.91.134.126] by isp-appsvr01.centuryc.com (SMTPD32-7.14) id A50F2CE009E; Thu, 05 Jun 2003 15:57:35 -1000
Received: from a66b91n134client123.hawaii.rr.com (66.91.134.123) by cybercominc-zzt with SMTP; Fri, 06 Jun 2003 02:00:44 GMT
X-Titankey-e_id: <f4191660-2c56-4a25-a5b7-e1f128291309>
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: RE: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2 (was: Implicit Consent (was: Another criteria for "what is spam"...))
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0
Message-ID: <DD198B5D07F04347B7266A3F35C42B0B0D8BB9@io.cybercom.local>
Thread-Topic: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2 (was: Implicit Consent (was: Another criteria for "what is spam"...))
Thread-Index: AcMrvsyMSxxLxLRLTDKyyd+Bvwsh6QAD76lg
From: Peter Kay <peter@titankey.com>
To: Vernon Schryver <vjs@calcite.rhyolite.com>, asrg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by www1.ietf.org id h561udB30519
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 15:54:14 -1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Vernon, My intention behind clarifying what UBE means in the context of attempting to define spam. If you want to use the dictionary terms for the words, perhaps you can go to the dictionary, pull out the words, and show us what you come up with. I tried that but what came out made a lot less sense. > -----Original Message----- > From: Vernon Schryver [mailto:vjs@calcite.rhyolite.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 1:05 PM > To: asrg@ietf.org > Subject: RE: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2 (was: Implicit > Consent (was: Another criteria for "what is spam"...)) > > > > From: "Peter Kay" <peter@titankey.com> > > > ... > > I agree: there is no such thing as implicit consent to receive bulk > > email. So therefore the updated definition goes like this: > > > > Spam is defined as unsolicited bulk email, or UBE > > > > Bulk email is defined as the transmission of 2 or more emails via a > > primarily automated process. > > > > Unsolicited email is defined as email where the recipient has not > > explicitly approved of receiving bulk email from the sender. > > > > Sender can mean an individual or an organization. > > > > In summary, UBE means: > > > > The transmission of multiple emails via a primarily > automated process > > to recipients that have not explicitly approved to receive such > > emails. > > > > OK gang, fire away. > > Either you keep avoiding my question or I've not asked > clearly. Why do you insist on complicating things instead of > using the dictionary defintions of "bulk" and "unsolicited"? > What is the significance of automation? Would 10,000 > messages sent manually not be spam? What is even one > desirable difference between "explicitly approved to receive" > and "unsolicited?" You say what sender can mean as if it > might mean some third thing. What is the third possibility? > A lot of clarity is lost by replacing "unsolicited bulk > email" with your 80 words. What is gained? > > On other hand, if the intent is to discuss reasons for > choosing "unsolicited bulk email," there ought to be about > 100 times as many words. > > > Vernon Schryver vjs@rhyolite.com > _______________________________________________ > Asrg mailing list > Asrg@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg > > > _______________________________________________ Asrg mailing list Asrg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
- RE: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2 (was: Implicit Co… Peter Kay
- Re: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2 (was: Implicit Co… Dave Crocker
- RE: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2 (was: Implicit Co… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2 Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2 Dave Crocker
- Re: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2 (was: Implicit Co… Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2 (was: Implicit Co… Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Re: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2 Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2 Dave Crocker
- Re: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2 Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2 (was: Implicit Co… Peter Kay
- RE: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2 (was: Implicit Co… Peter Kay