RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
Vernon Schryver <vjs@calcite.rhyolite.com> Mon, 19 May 2003 21:53 UTC
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA07065 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Mon, 19 May 2003 17:53:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h4JLMCY21187 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 19 May 2003 17:22:12 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4JLMBB21184 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Mon, 19 May 2003 17:22:11 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA07058; Mon, 19 May 2003 17:52:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19HsaM-0006r6-00; Mon, 19 May 2003 17:54:22 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=www1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19HsaL-0006r3-00; Mon, 19 May 2003 17:54:21 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4JLH3B20985; Mon, 19 May 2003 17:17:03 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4JLG8B20956 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Mon, 19 May 2003 17:16:08 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA06958 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 May 2003 17:46:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19HsUU-0006pd-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Mon, 19 May 2003 17:48:18 -0400
Received: from calcite.rhyolite.com ([192.188.61.3]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19HsUT-0006pU-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Mon, 19 May 2003 17:48:17 -0400
Received: (from vjs@localhost) by calcite.rhyolite.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id h4JLnYXx027185 for asrg@ietf.org env-from <vjs>; Mon, 19 May 2003 15:49:34 -0600 (MDT)
From: Vernon Schryver <vjs@calcite.rhyolite.com>
Message-Id: <200305192149.h4JLnYXx027185@calcite.rhyolite.com>
To: asrg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
References: <MBEKIIAKLDHKMLNFJODBCENDFDAA.eric@purespeed.com>
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 15:49:34 -0600
> From: "Eric Dean" <eric@purespeed.com> > > > For example, if 90% of spam is forged, then RMX, C/R, and > > > authentication schemes could do a lot against spam (modulo their > > > other problems). > > It's not a large step to estimate that 90% of spam is forged. What justifies that step? The available numbers and simple logic seem to say that something quite different. > 1) However, much of that spam can be filtered using simple sender domain > checks. Many spammers use bogus domains and maybe 5-10% of spam is dropped > accordingly. That's not what I see. About 192 or 0.6% of the last 27,972 spam caught by my traps had bogus sender domain names. Since modern versions of sendmail and other MTAs usually require that the sender domain exist, the surprise is that even that small amount of spam has bogus sender domains. > 2) The next value is to do a HELO hostname check..about 10-20% is dropped as > well. However, there are casualities for very large companies...such as > bellsouth and verizon whereby I have to punch holes in my filters. > 3) Then I could be more aggressive and apply a reverse-dns check on the > initiating source IP. Doing so is also effective, however, all DSL and > carrier Dial networks in-addr their IP pools...yet many mail admins don't. > I have aout another 5-10% of my spam come from unresolved IPs..but instantly > the phones light up..cost me money..and I'm out of business. The tough-love > approach is suicidal stupidity. > 4) Then OK, so now we go with RBL, to identify the pools..that'll > work..costs non-trivial money..but it works for that flavor of spam..maybe > 5%. Are those numbers based on measurements or intuition? > ... > My lesson in futility was that the only successful anti-spam method is a > distributed one. I like the word "distributed," but I don't understand that reasoning. Vernon Schryver vjs@rhyolite.com _______________________________________________ Asrg mailing list Asrg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Scott Nelson
- [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM add… Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Fred Bacon
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Alan DeKok
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Scott Nelson
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Michael Rubel
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Scott Nelson
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Michael Rubel
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Dave Crocker
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Alan DeKok
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Alan DeKok
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Alan DeKok
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Barry Shein
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Kee Hinckley
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Eric Dean
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Jon Kyme
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Eric Dean
- Re: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL … Jon Kyme
- RE: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL … Eric Dean
- Re: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL … Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL … Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Michael Rubel
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Tom Thomson
- Re: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL … Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Michael Rubel
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Daniel Feenberg
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Michael Rubel
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Michael Rubel
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Kee Hinckley
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Eric D. Williams
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Richard Rognlie
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Clayton, Nik [IT]
- Re: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL … Jon Kyme
- Re: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL … Jon Kyme
- RE: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL … Clayton, Nik [IT]
- RE: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL … Clayton, Nik [IT]
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Kee Hinckley
- Re: RE: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of M… Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Jon Kyme
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Tom Thomson
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… mathew
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… wayne
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Markus Stumpf
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Chris Lewis