Re: [Asrg] Adding a spam button to MUAs

Ian Eiloart <iane@sussex.ac.uk> Fri, 05 February 2010 10:39 UTC

Return-Path: <iane@sussex.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E783A69B9 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 02:39:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.455
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.455 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.012, BAYES_00=-2.599, SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION=0.156]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hSX6jEu2I1-V for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 02:39:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from karpinski.uscs.susx.ac.uk (karpinski.uscs.susx.ac.uk [139.184.14.85]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D716B3A6991 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 02:39:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lewes.staff.uscs.susx.ac.uk ([139.184.134.43]:59121) by karpinski.uscs.susx.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.64) (envelope-from <iane@sussex.ac.uk>) id KXD6ZX-0000FE-1I for asrg@irtf.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:40:45 +0000
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:40:29 +0000
From: Ian Eiloart <iane@sussex.ac.uk>
Sender: iane@sussex.ac.uk
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
Message-ID: <A387EC47D5C5CE53D223774F@lewes.staff.uscs.susx.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20100204232046.53178.qmail@simone.iecc.com>
References: <20100204232046.53178.qmail@simone.iecc.com>
Originator-Info: login-token=Mulberry:01KPONrZFU+xJpYOEPlBmbaAAgjmuuB4sZnV4=; token_authority=support@its.sussex.ac.uk
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Sussex: true
X-Sussex-transport: remote_smtp
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Adding a spam button to MUAs
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:39:40 -0000

--On 4 February 2010 23:20:46 +0000 John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> Actually, we've seen a reasonable suggestion a few messages back that
> would work equally well with POP and IMAP: extract a reporting address
> from the message and send it an ARF report.

Which is certainly not at all simpler than setting an IMAP flag on a 
message. And (if it's what the user desires) moving it out of the INBOX.

-- 
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
01273-873148 x3148
For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/