Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
"Jon Kyme" <jrk@merseymail.com> Tue, 20 May 2003 20:09 UTC
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA28547 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 20 May 2003 16:09:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h4KJZYw29684 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 20 May 2003 15:35:34 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4KJZYB29681 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 20 May 2003 15:35:34 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA28532; Tue, 20 May 2003 16:08:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19IDOG-0000Mj-00; Tue, 20 May 2003 16:07:16 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=www1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19IDOF-0000Mg-00; Tue, 20 May 2003 16:07:15 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4KJTAB29371; Tue, 20 May 2003 15:29:10 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4KJS6B29334 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 20 May 2003 15:28:06 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA28400 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 May 2003 16:01:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19IDH3-0000K6-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Tue, 20 May 2003 15:59:49 -0400
Received: from argon.connect.org.uk ([193.110.243.33]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19IDH2-0000K3-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Tue, 20 May 2003 15:59:48 -0400
Received: from mmail by argon.connect.org.uk with local (connectmail/exim) id 19IDIJ-0002Gl-00; Tue, 20 May 2003 21:01:07 +0100
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0305201142590.1499-100000@entropy.galcit.caltech.edu>
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses
To: Michael Rubel <asrg@mikerubel.org>
From: Jon Kyme <jrk@merseymail.com>
Cc: ASRG <asrg@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: [ConnectMail 3.5.5]
X-connectmail-Originating-IP: 193.195.0.101
Message-Id: <E19IDIJ-0002Gl-00@argon.connect.org.uk>
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 21:01:07 +0100
> > > > Even thought it might be recommended to do processing in real-time, in > > practice many systems do not and will not. We must be take that into > account. > Of course we must. We shouldn't assume Best Practice to be done by others. Best Practice is what we should try to do ourselves. > > I agree with Yakov, and would even go further. I think smtp-session > reject is falling out of favor and will eventually disappear. > Your evidence ? For goodness sake, *hotmail* do it. Of course they may be going to stop at any minute - in which case I'll look silly. > There are strong reasons to prefer accept-then-bounce or even filter to > reject. > > (1) Reject gives feedback about your system to would-be bad > guys--including dictionary spammers--in a much faster and more > reliable way. Sysadmins rightly want to give out as little > information as possible, because that's standard practice anywhere > security is involved. This is a variation of security through obscurity. And we know how well that works. > > (2) Reject is a less flexible mechanism. Accept-then-bounce or filter > allows recipients to work around certain obselete or overzealous > systems. How so? > > (3) Senders have come to understand that messages get incorrectly > filtered as spam sometimes; they no longer expect to recieve an > immediate rejection if there is a problem delivering a message. > Which senders no longer expect this? All of them? You've asked them all? > Like ident, smtp-reject has some usefulness inside private networks, but > one shouldn't expect to see it widely used on the public Internet. > Why compare this to ident? What's the point? And who says I shouldn't expect Best Practice on the public Internet (while being prepared for less). If we really think that BCP30 is so hopelessly outdated, wouldn't this be a good place to start rewriting it. Jon (tired) Kyme -- _______________________________________________ Asrg mailing list Asrg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Scott Nelson
- [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM add… Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Fred Bacon
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Alan DeKok
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Scott Nelson
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Michael Rubel
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Scott Nelson
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Michael Rubel
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Dave Crocker
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Alan DeKok
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Alan DeKok
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Alan DeKok
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Barry Shein
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Kee Hinckley
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Eric Dean
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Jon Kyme
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Eric Dean
- Re: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL … Jon Kyme
- RE: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL … Eric Dean
- Re: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL … Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL … Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Michael Rubel
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Tom Thomson
- Re: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL … Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Michael Rubel
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Daniel Feenberg
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Michael Rubel
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Michael Rubel
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Kee Hinckley
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Eric D. Williams
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Richard Rognlie
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Clayton, Nik [IT]
- Re: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL … Jon Kyme
- Re: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL … Jon Kyme
- RE: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL … Clayton, Nik [IT]
- RE: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL … Clayton, Nik [IT]
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Kee Hinckley
- Re: RE: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of M… Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Jon Kyme
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Tom Thomson
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… mathew
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… wayne
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Markus Stumpf
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM… Chris Lewis