Re: [Asrg] Adding a spam button to MUAs

Ian Eiloart <iane@sussex.ac.uk> Thu, 10 December 2009 10:23 UTC

Return-Path: <iane@sussex.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B333A6AD1 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 02:23:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.944
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.944 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.499, BAYES_00=-2.599, SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION=0.156]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EU59CPhQmxZV for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 02:23:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sivits.uscs.susx.ac.uk (sivits.uscs.susx.ac.uk [139.184.14.88]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C5403A67DB for <asrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 02:23:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lewes.staff.uscs.susx.ac.uk ([139.184.134.43]:58512) by sivits.uscs.susx.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.64) (envelope-from <iane@sussex.ac.uk>) id KUFM7G-000E0C-FO for asrg@irtf.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:23:40 +0000
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:23:06 +0000
From: Ian Eiloart <iane@sussex.ac.uk>
Sender: iane@sussex.ac.uk
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
Message-ID: <F9EE16176E9BB866F2598372@lewes.staff.uscs.susx.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20091209202610.80703.qmail@simone.iecc.com>
References: <20091209202610.80703.qmail@simone.iecc.com>
Originator-Info: login-token=Mulberry:01xp+BOy8A76AHDNWdMsU5FPSuLBeilSnFOwo=; token_authority=support@its.sussex.ac.uk
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Sussex: true
X-Sussex-transport: remote_smtp
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Adding a spam button to MUAs
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:23:33 -0000

--On 9 December 2009 20:26:10 +0000 John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

>> Feedback is going to be controversial in this group.
>
> I don't see why.
>
>> The first thing I would like to see was for email clients to
>> automatically  include headers for all mail forwarded to "postmaster" or
>> "abuse".
>
> Let's assume that any reports sent by SMTP are in ARF format which (when
> implemented correctly) includes the entire message at issue.

I think that was a suggestion orthoganol to the issue at discussion. It's 
not about use of a "spam" button, but about any message forwarded to 
"postmaster", for any purpose.

But, ARF formatted reports would achieve this when the spam button is hit.

> R's,
> John
> _______________________________________________
> Asrg mailing list
> Asrg@irtf.org
> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg



-- 
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
01273-873148 x3148
For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/