IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Asrg] Is there anything good enough? - Spoofing stats

Vernon Schryver <vjs@calcite.rhyolite.com> Thu, 08 May 2003 17:36 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA01091 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 8 May 2003 13:36:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h48HkMw01870 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 8 May 2003 13:46:22 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h48HkM801867 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 8 May 2003 13:46:22 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA01082; Thu, 8 May 2003 13:36:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19DpLZ-0004Yy-00; Thu, 08 May 2003 13:38:21 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=www1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19DpLZ-0004Yv-00; Thu, 08 May 2003 13:38:21 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h48Hh4801720; Thu, 8 May 2003 13:43:04 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h48Hh0801703 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 8 May 2003 13:43:00 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA00999 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 May 2003 13:32:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19DpIJ-0004Xu-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Thu, 08 May 2003 13:34:59 -0400
Received: from calcite.rhyolite.com ([192.188.61.3]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19DpII-0004Xp-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Thu, 08 May 2003 13:34:58 -0400
Received: (from vjs@localhost) by calcite.rhyolite.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id h48HZrKe001817 for asrg@ietf.org env-from <vjs>; Thu, 8 May 2003 11:35:53 -0600 (MDT)
From: Vernon Schryver <vjs@calcite.rhyolite.com>
Message-Id: <200305081735.h48HZrKe001817@calcite.rhyolite.com>
To: asrg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Is there anything good enough? - Spoofing stats
References: <200305081227.03856@grx>
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 11:35:53 -0600

> From: David Walker <antispam@grax.com>

> > So why haven't you long since implemented the standard checks to
> > prevent what you call "spoofed" free provider mail?
>
> They are not standards-based.  There is no standard for specifiying that a 
> specific server is an acceptable server to send mail for a domain.  I may at 
> some point decide to implement them but they are certainly not acceptable 
> solutions and we don't need to discuss them here.

Since they have exactly the effects that you advocate, why are they
not acceptable solutions?

Why are they not appropriate topics for discussion here?


Vernon Schryver    vjs@rhyolite.com
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email