RE: [Asrg] Suggested reply?

Yakov Shafranovich <research@solidmatrix.com> Tue, 13 May 2003 23:45 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA04189 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 13 May 2003 19:45:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h4DNBQx08503 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 13 May 2003 19:11:26 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4DNBQB08500 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 13 May 2003 19:11:26 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA04185; Tue, 13 May 2003 19:44:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19FjTh-0000qp-00; Tue, 13 May 2003 19:46:37 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=www1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19FjTg-0000qm-00; Tue, 13 May 2003 19:46:36 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4DN9JB08443; Tue, 13 May 2003 19:09:19 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4DN8QB08395 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 13 May 2003 19:08:26 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA04142 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 May 2003 19:41:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19FjQn-0000pu-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Tue, 13 May 2003 19:43:37 -0400
Received: from 000-246-276.area7.spcsdns.net ([68.27.201.151] helo=68.27.201.151) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 19FjQk-0000pr-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Tue, 13 May 2003 19:43:35 -0400
Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20030513194041.00bb7ae8@std5.imagineis.com>
X-Sender: research@solidmatrix.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9
To: asrg@ietf.org
From: Yakov Shafranovich <research@solidmatrix.com>
Subject: RE: [Asrg] Suggested reply?
In-Reply-To: <002101c31996$ad407fa0$7101a8c0@BOBDEV>
References: <4B91B49E5EBCBA448687A033B3C7BC5905F3D885@bremocag>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-MimeHeaders-Plugin-Info: v2.03.00
X-GCMulti: 1
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 19:41:32 -0400

We should take this into account - when blacklisting someone, provide an 
email address for the admin where the blacklisted party can communicate 
with the owner of the system.

At 05:29 PM 5/13/2003 -0400, Bob Wyman wrote:

>Damon Sauer wrote:
> >any suggested replies?
>         You can't reply... If the email is correct, your mailserver has
>been firewalled by these folk and so your reply can't be delivered...
>         Was there ever a better case against blacklisting?
>
>                 bob wyman
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: asrg-admin@ietf.org [mailto:asrg-admin@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>Sauer, Damon
>Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 4:07 PM
>To: asrg@ietf.org
>Subject: [Asrg] Suggested reply?
>
>
>Boy, what I REALLY need is an RMX system so that this guy doesn't
>black-list me.
>
>  I also thought this might be fun- any suggested replies?
>
>-Damon
>
>
>
> > From:         Security & Abuse Department[SMTP:ABUSE@PNWX.COM]
> > Sent:         Tuesday, May 13, 2003 1:20:53 PM
> > To:   postmaster@; hostmaster@;
> > Subject:      WE HAVE JUST BLACKLISTED xxx.xxx.xxx.0/24 BECUASE YOUR
>BRAIN
>DEAD MAIL SERVER APPARENTLY SENDS AUTO RESPONSES TO SPOOFED ADDRESSES IN
>SPAM. WE HAVE SENT NO E-MAIL WARRANTING THIS AUTO-ACK!
> > Auto forwarded by a Rule
> >
>We received an auto-response(s) from your mail server spam scanner. It's
>claiming we are sending out spam. It would seem that your system is the
>victim of Joe Jobs. Spammers, unlike other e-mail senders SPOOF the
>From: and Reply-To: headers with addresses from the victims they wish to
>attack. Rest assured WE ARE NOT SENDING OUT SPAM!
>
>We do have to chastise you for using a broken mail server that sends
>these "auto-replys". Having a mail server send such replies is brain
>dead because it can easily be used to send trash to someone who had
>nothing to do with it.
>
>NOTICE: WE HAVE FIREWALLED THE C-BLOCK THAT THIS MAIL SERVER RESIDES IN
>TILL WE RECEIVE A RESPONSE FROM YOU STATING THAT THIS PROBLEM HAS BEEN
>RESOLVED!!!
>
>
>Security & Abuse Department
>pnwx.com
>
>
>*****
>"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity
>to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary,
>and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination
>or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this
>information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
>prohibited.  If you received this in error, please contact the sender
>and delete the material from all computers."
>_______________________________________________
>Asrg mailing list
>Asrg@ietf.org
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
>
>_______________________________________________
>Asrg mailing list
>Asrg@ietf.org
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg