IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records)

Matt Sergeant <msergeant@startechgroup.co.uk> Wed, 05 March 2003 14:13 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA00845 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 09:13:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h25EOQM28943 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 09:24:26 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h25EOQ528940 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 09:24:26 -0500
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA00833; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 09:12:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h25EN1528869; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 09:23:01 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h25EMw528849 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 09:22:58 -0500
Received: from matt-dev.int.star.co.uk (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id JAA00793 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 09:11:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: (qmail 5543 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2003 14:11:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.2.100.178?) (10.2.100.178) by matt?dev.int.star.co.uk with SMTP; 4 Mar 2003 14:11:49 -0000
From: Matt Sergeant <msergeant@startechgroup.co.uk>
X-X-Sender: matt@localhost.localdomain
To: "David F. Skoll" <dfs@roaringpenguin.com>
cc: "asrg@ietf.org" <asrg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0303050847550.2048@shishi.roaringpenguin.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303051421440.28546-100000@localhost.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 14:26:06 +0000

On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, David F. Skoll wrote:

> Spam does not really cost ISP's anything except bandwidth and storage.
> They don't care (nor should they) if their end-users are less productive;
> that's a worry only for companies.

I hope only someone who has never worked at an ISP would ever say this. 

Spam costs ISPs a lot in admin time, and there are lots of hidden costs 
of spam at an ISP that are very tricky to account for.

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email