RE: [Asrg] CRI Header

At 11:15 PM 6/4/2003 -0400, Eric D. Williams wrote:

>On Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:54 PM, Eric Dean [SMTP:eric@purespeed.com] 
>wrote:
>8<...>8
> > ok..optional headers or do we introduce a new one?  There isn't an RFC 2822
> > registration process that I am aware of.
>
>IMHO the question at this stage is 'optional headers or the introduction 
>of an
>new one?  Would a comparable RFC 2822 header field be as effective?'
>[..]

Both an "X-CRI" and "CRI" headers should be defined. Until the standard 
gets approved, the "X-" headers will be used, once the standard is approved 
then both the "X-CRI" and "CRI" headers are used. This is similar to the 
HTTP protocol where both "gzip" and "x-gzip" are used to indicate gzip 
encoding (RFC 2616, section 3.5).

Yakov

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yakov Shafranovich / <research@solidmatrix.com>
SolidMatrix Research, a division of SolidMatrix Technologies, Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"One who watches the wind will never sow, and one who keeps his eyes on
the clouds will never reap" (Ecclesiastes 11:4)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg