IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Asrg] Consent Proposal

Yakov Shafranovich <research@solidmatrix.com> Tue, 01 July 2003 17:48 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA08290 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 13:48:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h5RIbna13805 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 14:37:49 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19Vy6V-0003Zz-BX for asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 14:37:47 -0400
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA11612; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 14:37:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19Vy5x-0003Ho-0w; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 14:37:13 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19Vw5S-000875-SF for asrg@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 12:28:34 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA06561 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 12:28:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19Vw5R-0004Rh-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 12:28:33 -0400
Received: from 000-256-240.area7.spcsdns.net ([68.27.240.209] helo=68.27.240.209 ident=trilluser) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 19Vw5E-0004RL-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 12:28:22 -0400
Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20030627122353.00ba3700@std5.imagineis.com>
X-Sender: research@solidmatrix.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9
To: Jon Kyme <jrk@merseymail.com>
From: Yakov Shafranovich <research@solidmatrix.com>
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Consent Proposal
Cc: ASRG <asrg@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <E19Vn7J-00031y-00@argon.connect.org.uk>
References: <5.2.0.9.2.20030626205450.00b41768@std5.imagineis.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-MimeHeaders-Plugin-Info: v2.03.00
X-GCMulti: 1
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 12:27:57 -0400

At 07:53 AM 6/27/2003 +0100, Jon Kyme wrote:

> > >I don't believe that this adds up to what you claim.
> > >
> > >There was some more fundamental (but probably premature)
> > >discussion of "consent" early in the life this group.
> >
> > The charter goes on and on about consent, however aside from Gordon's
> > HTML
> > blocking thread, there has been no discussion of that.
>
>You might be interested in the threads starting with
><E18r0iB-0000Ci-00@mail.nitros9.org> "[Asrg] The Consent 4-Tuple"
>and

Original message at 
https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/asrg/current/msg00669.html

><E18sKmk-00009r-00@argon.connect.org.uk> "[Asrg] What would consent look
>like?"

Original message at 
https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/asrg/current/msg01022.html:

---snip---
Consent might look something like this:
applies-to:  user@domain.example
classes:     set of message classifications
access:      allow | deny
scope:       local | organisational | global
---snip---

And  


_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email