[Asrg] 答复: DNS-based Email Sender Authentication Mechanisms: aCritical Review

Sean Shen <sshen@huawei.com> Mon, 25 May 2009 06:25 UTC

Return-Path: <sshen@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E07683A6DB2 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 May 2009 23:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.405
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.405 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-3.395, BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RDNS_NONE=0.1, SARE_SUB_ENC_GB2312=1.345]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ldNtQeobN3O1 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 May 2009 23:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (unknown [119.145.14.65]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7458D3A6CF1 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Sun, 24 May 2009 23:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga02-in [172.24.2.6]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KK6007VJSK9IB@szxga02-in.huawei.com> for asrg@irtf.org; Mon, 25 May 2009 14:26:33 +0800 (CST)
Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.1.33]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KK600B6PSK9YY@szxga02-in.huawei.com> for asrg@irtf.org; Mon, 25 May 2009 14:26:33 +0800 (CST)
Received: from s00102542 ([10.111.12.128]) by szxml06-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0KK600MVXSK8C5@szxml06-in.huawei.com> for asrg@irtf.org; Mon, 25 May 2009 14:26:33 +0800 (CST)
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 14:26:32 +0800
From: Sean Shen <sshen@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <45DE9A70-4D7F-4B75-B711-9B698C6ECD22@blighty.com>
To: 'Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF' <asrg@irtf.org>
Message-id: <003d01c9dd01$bf3531d0$800c6f0a@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Content-type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Thread-index: AcncipRk0RBHk1UHTd6jwmuC7s2hkgAZMSbg
Subject: [Asrg] 答复: DNS-based Email Sender Authentication Mechanisms: aCritical Review
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 06:25:10 -0000

> On May 24, 2009, at 12:58 AM, Amir Herzberg wrote:
> 
> > Hi guys, I wrote a `critical review' of SPF, DKIM and Sender-ID 
> > Framework (SIDF); it's in process of publication at `computer & 
> > security`, you can see it at 
> > http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2009.05.002
> >  (pending editing, final changes etc.). Nothing much new, just an 
> > attempt to provide a fair-yet-critical survey, hopefully to help 
> > clarify this important subject. Comments will be most welcome.
> > Abstract below.
> 
> I'm not going to pay $31.50 to review someone's work. Nor is 
> anyone else, I suspect.
> 
> Cheers,
>    Steve

I got very surprised that on asrg mailinglist I was induced to pay and
review a paper. Is this a mistake or an advertisement?

Sean