RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...
Vernon Schryver <vjs@calcite.rhyolite.com> Thu, 05 June 2003 00:01 UTC
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA18396 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 20:01:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h5501H032070 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 20:01:17 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5501HB32067 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 20:01:17 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA18386; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 20:01:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19NiA8-0001Or-00; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 19:59:24 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=www1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19NiA7-0001Oo-00; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 19:59:23 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h54NxhB31919; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 19:59:43 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h54NwIB31862 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 19:58:18 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA18076 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 19:58:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19Ni7F-0001LH-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 19:56:25 -0400
Received: from calcite.rhyolite.com ([192.188.61.3]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19Ni7D-0001LD-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 19:56:24 -0400
Received: (from vjs@localhost) by calcite.rhyolite.com (8.12.10.Beta0/8.12.10.Beta0) id h54NwDp3004952 for asrg@ietf.org env-from <vjs>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 17:58:13 -0600 (MDT)
From: Vernon Schryver <vjs@calcite.rhyolite.com>
Message-Id: <200306042358.h54NwDp3004952@calcite.rhyolite.com>
To: asrg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...
References: <DD198B5D07F04347B7266A3F35C42B0B0FD023@io.cybercom.local>
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 17:58:13 -0600
> From: "Peter Kay" <peter@titankey.com> > ... > is Internet email inherently trusted or is it untrusted? Trust is gone, just as it evaporated from voice telephones a long time ago. > Is all email considered unsolicited until the recipient says otherwise? Some kinds of mail has implicit consent. Almost everyone who has a public mailbox welcomes or at least consents to non-bulk, inoffensive mail. There is a good analogy between the calls you implicitly consent to receive at a "published" (i.e. not "unlisted") telephone number and the mail you implicitly consent to receive at an email address that you have published in directories or divulged to individuals or organizations. The telephone calls that bother people are similar to mail spam. > ... > > Note that the Internet was in the hands of capitalists for > > almost as many years before email spam became a problem as it > > has been since spam became noticable. > > Are you sure about that? When was commercial Internet use OK? When did > Canter & Siegel send the first spam? Maybe you mean "spam became > unbearable" instead of "noticable". 1 spam = noticable. 100 = > unbearable. Canter&Siegal sent netnews or usenet spam long before email spam became a problem. Plenty of commercial use of the Internet was OK even in the 1980's, as many of us worked for commercial outfits at the time can attest. That was true not only of the baldly commercial parts of the net but also on the NSFNET provided you could offer some kind of reasonable excuse that whatever you were doing was "in support of research or education," even if you were making a profit at it or only selling goods or services to other commercial outfits. I connected a UNIX vendor to the net via CSNET using a leased line to facilities run by another computer vendor in 1986. http://ei.cs.vt.edu/~wwwbtb/book/chap1/net_hist.html says there were 1,000,000 hosts in 1992. I doubt they were all in the hands of socialists or whatever are other than capitalists. Vernon Schryver vjs@rhyolite.com _______________________________________________ Asrg mailing list Asrg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
- [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Art Pollard
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Peter Kay
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Bill Cole
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Eric D. Williams
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Dave Crocker
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Dave Crocker
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Dave Aronson
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Dave Aronson
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Alberto França
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Bill Cole
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Dave Crocker
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Peter Kay
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Bill Cole
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... kent
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Peter Kay
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Barry Shein
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... kent
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Peter Kay
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Peter Kay
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Barry Shein
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Peter Kay
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Barry Shein
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Peter Kay
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Peter Kay
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Barry Shein
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Barry Shein
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Peter Kay
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Peter Kay
- [Asrg] Spam Isn't Just Sleaze (was: Another crite… Dave Aronson
- [Asrg] Implicit Consent (was: Another criteria fo… Dave Aronson
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Dave Aronson
- [Asrg] Line Fuzziness (was: Another criteria for … Dave Aronson
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... C. Wegrzyn
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Bill Cole
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Dave Aronson
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Beadles, Mark A
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... mathew
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... mathew
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Margie Arbon
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... mathew
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... mathew
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... Dave Aronson
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... waltdnes
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"... waltdnes