[Asrg] DNSBL cache modelling
"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 03 October 2012 04:26 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 135E621F8666 for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 2 Oct 2012 21:26:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.893
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-109.893 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.294, BAYES_50=0.001,
HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O7cSPJdh2TeI for
<asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 21:26:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com
[IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with
ESMTP id BC89221F8620 for <asrg@irtf.org>;
Tue, 2 Oct 2012 21:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 94488 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2012 04:26:31 -0000
Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP;
3 Oct 2012 04:26:31 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com;
h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info;
s=506bbe77.xn--yuvv84g.k1208; i=johnl@user.iecc.com;
bh=F6hfT3TywPMXt0g3LfOnlNoE8LA/LgyJI31THnYR8qQ=;
b=UAyjPEydktGr88C9+qv99Z4aIqaXB7Ceo5wJWyqC6bQ0/52xXuUsk8CZ6ORlVOGWmhnYgOsdZhOtUq8B82y7u1wGvHN02V0xvq3tVz/J3Rhb4VHI3CJ2pgDB5L5FkyF4eQ2RtjdUou/q2BlF+aoVWNRQrVneMb7z2cc7GKYKbGs=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com;
h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info;
s=506bbe77.xn--yuvv84g.k1208; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com;
bh=F6hfT3TywPMXt0g3LfOnlNoE8LA/LgyJI31THnYR8qQ=;
b=w01FxzL6vAfxkbir6yBy0fkkElqlA2SO/ZpgGMLInrohOymjqrpVNK2lEaBznrr4+4nGul9vCl4TTcUS7F22j1flqbFn6cz9j1Z+sr6c7A3LBO189u9VOteeaCcKlR0mTNKeQKkYvlTqVNvw6rArUghw+eq1SNg/IMhWNTmvzQI=
VBR-Info: md=iecc.com; mc=all; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org
Date: 3 Oct 2012 04:26:09 -0000
Message-ID: <20121003042609.97192.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: asrg@irtf.org
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Asrg] DNSBL cache modelling
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/asrg>,
<mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>,
<mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 04:26:36 -0000
In response to the question I sent out a few weeks ago, I've gotten offers from several people to provide mail server traces of [IP, timestamp] that should be enough to at least start on some cache models. I am planning to hack stuff up myself, but it would be nice to have another person or two to work with, both to compare notes, and because my statistics are a bit rusty, what with my most recent course on the topic having been in about 1974. I'd like to make some estimates like, how long a run do you need to have an N% confidence level that you've found the average cache hit rate. The MAAWG meeting later this month has invited a bunch of academic researchers, and I'll be pitching this to them, too, but you all get first dibs. If you want to do some of the simulation programming, that would be nice, too. R's, John
- [Asrg] DNSBL cache modelling John Levine