Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam
Yakov Shafranovich <research@solidmatrix.com> Wed, 21 May 2003 18:09 UTC
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA00197 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 21 May 2003 14:09:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h4LHakG01680 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 21 May 2003 13:36:46 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4LHakB01677 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 21 May 2003 13:36:46 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA00185; Wed, 21 May 2003 14:09:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19IY0O-00013y-00; Wed, 21 May 2003 14:08:00 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=www1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19IY0O-00013v-00; Wed, 21 May 2003 14:08:00 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4LHU1B01364; Wed, 21 May 2003 13:30:01 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4LHTAB01315 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 21 May 2003 13:29:10 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA29990 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 May 2003 14:01:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19IXt2-00011f-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Wed, 21 May 2003 14:00:24 -0400
Received: from 000-246-401.area7.spcsdns.net ([68.27.202.22] helo=68.27.202.22) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 19IXt0-00011a-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Wed, 21 May 2003 14:00:23 -0400
Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20030521135403.00b9cfe0@std5.imagineis.com>
X-Sender: research@solidmatrix.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9
To: asrg@ietf.org
From: Yakov Shafranovich <research@solidmatrix.com>
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam
In-Reply-To: <006601c31f94$e59453f0$0301a8c0@nv6881>
References: <004301c31d99$6e777470$3e0a37cb@advdata.com.au> <006301c31e49$9d79b1b0$0301a8c0@nv6881> <p06001205baeef8c495c5@[192.168.1.104]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-MimeHeaders-Plugin-Info: v2.03.00
X-GCMulti: 1
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 14:01:15 -0400
> > At 6:00 AM +0900 5/20/03, Shannon Jacobs wrote: > >> However, I've already said that I think the obvious solution is to > >> provide an alternative cash-up-front email system. There are plenty > >> of things wrong with snail mail, but it does work quite effectively > >> in limiting the volume of physical spam we receive > > As a technical standards group, we can define the general protocol that can be used for such systems leaving the actual implementations aside. This is similar to the efforts on developing an interworking C/R protocol by Eric Dean. Just like all other solutions (C/R for ex.), an economic up-front system will not be acceptable to everyone and not everyone will be using it. As Dave Crocker states in his draft (http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-crocker-spam-techconsider-01.txt) "it is not clear that it is possible to retroactively fit the necessary mechanisms to Internet mail. Its complete absence from the current service and the existence of anonymous and free email services may provide too much operational inertia. It is also not clear who should receive the fees or how they should be disbursed." Therefore, I think we should look at such systems as one of the possible solutions against spam. There are already some startups that use this system. Our goal as a standards group should be on standardizing a protocol that can be used by many such systems to interoperate among themselves. Whether the actual systems SHOULD be implemented or recommended is a different question, but based on what we are seeing now, some of these systems already exists and more will be implemented - just like the many C/R systems. Our goal is to make sure they interoperate. Yakov --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yakov Shafranovich / <research@solidmatrix.com> SolidMatrix Research, a division of SolidMatrix Technologies, Inc. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "One who watches the wind will never sow, and one who keeps his eyes on the clouds will never reap" (Ecclesiastes 11:4) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Asrg mailing list Asrg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
- [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam Chui Tey
- Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam Shannon Jacobs
- Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam Shannon Jacobs
- Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam John Fenley
- Re: [Asrg] [Yet another] article on spam Shannon Jacobs
- [Asrg] Economic methods for controlling spam (was… Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam Kee Hinckley
- [Asrg] Re: Pay-for-attention (Was Re: article on … mathew
- [Asrg] Re: Pay-for-attention (Was Re: article on … Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Pay-for-attention (Was Re: article… Mitch Wagner