Re: [Asrg] request for review for a non FUSSP proposal

"Claudio Telmon" <claudio@telmon.org> Wed, 24 June 2009 18:01 UTC

Return-Path: <64414253@ngi.it>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 310243A6C8F for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:01:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.929, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LnXA+boZg1Ky for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:01:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slim-4c.inet.it (slim-4c.inet.it [213.92.5.127]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F30A93A6819 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:01:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ::ffff:212.234.174.155 ([::ffff:212.234.174.155]) by slim-4c.inet.it via I-SMTP-5.6.0-560 id ::ffff:212.234.174.155+EYuVA5rsp; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:20:52 +0200
From: "Claudio Telmon" <claudio@telmon.org>
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
X-wmSenderIP: 212.234.174.155
Message-ID: <212.234.174.155.98452337.1245864051@webmail.inet.it>
In-Reply-To: <812375D23E32D2ADE271A8F2@lewes.staff.uscs.susx.ac.uk>
References: <20090623213728.1825.qmail@simone.iecc.com> <4A41D773.50508@telmon.org> <4A41E506.2010106@mines-paristech.fr> <008E8EE8BFAAE1C24E4F75DF@lewes.staff.uscs.susx.ac.uk> <4A41F87F.4040506@mines-paristech.fr> <812375D23E32D2ADE271A8F2@lewes.staff.uscs.susx.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:20:51 +0000
X-Mailer: NGI Webmail
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [Asrg] request for review for a non FUSSP proposal
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: claudio@telmon.org, Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 07:12:01 -0000

> > Well, you submited my message to spamcop... ;-). Their address was in the
> > list of recipients...
> 
> Sorry - was using my mail client's autocomplete to check the format. Forgot 
> to delete the address <blush>. Actually, the report isn't complete until I 
> confirm it, and spamcop probably won't be able to parse the report because 
> my message to them didn't include your message headers.
> 
> Hmm, maybe some address harvester will harvest that address and start 
> spamming spamcop directly, cutting me out of the loop! Perhaps I'd better 
> try to change the address.
> 

This is a joke you made me, isn't it? :)  Spamcop is using address tagging, and you happened to demonstrate what I said about the risks that tags get disclosed when sending messages to multiple recipients, since addresses may be in many places in the body of the message, whereas a specific header could be detected and purged by the MUA/MTA...